Jump to content

Learning sciences: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
FCSundae (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 348390022 by Pmvan (talk) rv unexplained deletion of content
Pmvan (talk | contribs)
Line 15: Line 15:


Several significant events have contributed to the international development of the Learning Sciences. Beginning in the early 1970 the journal [http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/learning+%26+instruction/journal/11251 Instructional Science] began to lay the ground work for a new field that was to develop over the next four decades. This journal published studies addressing learning processes, learning technology, learner characteristics, and learning outcomes.
Several significant events have contributed to the international development of the Learning Sciences. Beginning in the early 1970 the journal [http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/learning+%26+instruction/journal/11251 Instructional Science] began to lay the ground work for a new field that was to develop over the next four decades. This journal published studies addressing learning processes, learning technology, learner characteristics, and learning outcomes.

Another historic event took place in Australia in the 1980s when [[John Sweller]] began to consider worked examples as form of instruction <ref>{{cite journal | ref=harv
| author=Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A.
| year=1985
| title= The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra
| journal= Cognition and Instruction
| volume=2 | issue=1
| pages=59–89
| doi=10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3
}}</ref>. Sweller later published the theory of [[Cognitive load theory]] <ref name="Sweller, 1988">{{cite journal|
author=Sweller, J.| year=1988| title= Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning|
journal= Cognitive Science| volume=12| issue=2| pages=257–285| doi= 10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7}}</ref> in the journal Cognition and Instruction. This theory revolutionized our thinking about structure of instructional materials and the effects it has on learning <ref name="Paas, 1992">{{cite journal|
author=Paas, F.| year=1992| title= Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach|
journal= Journal of Educational Psychology|
volume=84| issue=| pages=429–434| doi= 10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429}}</ref> and even in the past decade has begun to provide evidence-based guidelines for development of e-learning <ref name="clark et al"> {{cite book|
author=Clark, R., Nguyen, F., and Sweller, J.|
year=2006| title=Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load|
location=San Francisco | publisher=Pfeiffer|
isbn=0-7879-7728-4}}</ref>. Also about this time Richard Mayer began his studies of multiple modalities or the use of [[Dual-coding theory]] to understand learning given multimedia<ref>{{cite book|last=Mayer|first=R.| title=multimedia learning|year=2001|isbn=0521782392|publisher=Cambridge University Press}}</ref>. Each of these individual contributed greatly to this field and have provided us with a number of learning effects including the [[Worked-example effect]] <ref>{{cite journal | ref=harv
| author=Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A.
| year=1985
| title= The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra
| journal= Cognition and Instruction
| volume=2 | issue=1
| pages=59–89
| doi=10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3
}}</ref> [[Split attention effect]]<ref name="Chandler and Sweller, 1992">{{cite journal|
author=Chandler, P., & Sweller, J.|
year=1992|
title= The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction|
journal= British Journal of Educational Psychology|
volume=62|
issue=|
pages=233–246}}</ref>, and modality effect (see [[multimedia learning]])<ref>{{cite book|last=Mayer|first=R.|title=The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning|year=2005|isbn=9780521838733|publisher=Cambridge University Press}}</ref>.


In the United States, an important effort to create a graduate program in the Learning Sciences took place in 1983 when Jan Hawkins and [[Roy Pea]] proposed a joint program between Bank Street College and the [http://www.newschool.edu/nssr/ New School for Social Research]. Called "Psychology, Education, and Technology" (PET), the program had a planning grant supported by the Sloan Foundation. In the end the program would have required new faculty, though, and the institutions involved never established such a program. [[Roger Schank]]'s arrival at Northwestern University in 1988 helped start the Institute for Learning Sciences. In 1991, Northwestern initiated the first Learning Sciences doctoral program, designed by and launched by Roy Pea as its first Director. The program began accepting students in 1992, and after Pea became Dean the program directorship was taken over by Brian Reiser.
In the United States, an important effort to create a graduate program in the Learning Sciences took place in 1983 when Jan Hawkins and [[Roy Pea]] proposed a joint program between Bank Street College and the [http://www.newschool.edu/nssr/ New School for Social Research]. Called "Psychology, Education, and Technology" (PET), the program had a planning grant supported by the Sloan Foundation. In the end the program would have required new faculty, though, and the institutions involved never established such a program. [[Roger Schank]]'s arrival at Northwestern University in 1988 helped start the Institute for Learning Sciences. In 1991, Northwestern initiated the first Learning Sciences doctoral program, designed by and launched by Roy Pea as its first Director. The program began accepting students in 1992, and after Pea became Dean the program directorship was taken over by Brian Reiser.

Revision as of 20:42, 7 March 2010

The term Learning Sciences (LS) refers to an interdisciplinary field that works to further scientific understanding of learning as well as to engage in the design and implementation of learning innovations, and improvement of instructional methodologies. Research in the learning sciences traditionally focuses on cognitive-psychological and social-psychological foundations of human learning, as well as on the design of learning environments. Major contributing fields include cognitive science, computer science, educational psychology, and anthropology. Over the past decade, researchers have also expanded their focus to the design of curricula, informal learning environments, instructional methods, and policy innovations.

As an emerging discipline, Learning Sciences is still in the process of defining itself. Accordingly, the identity of the field is multifaceted, and varies from institution to institution. However, the International Society of Learning Sciences (ISLS, [1]) summarizes the field as follows: "Researchers in the interdisciplinary field of learning sciences, born during the 1990’s, study learning as it happens in real-world situations and how to better facilitate learning in designed environments – in school, online, in the workplace, at home, and in informal environments. Learning sciences research may be guided by constructivist, social-constructivist, socio-cognitive, and socio-cultural theories of learning." ISLS has a large worldwide membership, is affiliated with two international journals: "Journal of the Learning Sciences", and "International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning", and sponsors the biennial Computer Supported Collaborative Learning conference and International Conference of the Learning Sciences on alternate years."

Science by its very nature is evidence based, therefore researchers developing the Learning Sciences often consider the efficiency or efficacy of instructional strategies that encourage learning[1]. So in additon to socio-cultural theories of learning, several other theories like cognitive load theory or the cognitive theory of multimedia learning[2][3][4] have contributed to the this growing field and are often discussed in journal like Cognition and Instruction or Instructional Science, An International Journal of the Learning Sciences

Although controlled experimental studies and rigorous quantitative research have long been employed in Learning Sciences, LS researchers sometimes utilize Design-Based Research methods. Interventions are conceptualized and then implemented in natural settings in order to test the ecological validity of dominant theory and to develop new theories and frameworks for conceptualizing learning, instruction, design processes, and educational reform. LS research strives to generate principles of practice beyond the particular features of an educational innovation in order to solve real educational problems, giving LS its interventionist character.

History

Several significant events have contributed to the international development of the Learning Sciences. Beginning in the early 1970 the journal Instructional Science began to lay the ground work for a new field that was to develop over the next four decades. This journal published studies addressing learning processes, learning technology, learner characteristics, and learning outcomes.

In the United States, an important effort to create a graduate program in the Learning Sciences took place in 1983 when Jan Hawkins and Roy Pea proposed a joint program between Bank Street College and the New School for Social Research. Called "Psychology, Education, and Technology" (PET), the program had a planning grant supported by the Sloan Foundation. In the end the program would have required new faculty, though, and the institutions involved never established such a program. Roger Schank's arrival at Northwestern University in 1988 helped start the Institute for Learning Sciences. In 1991, Northwestern initiated the first Learning Sciences doctoral program, designed by and launched by Roy Pea as its first Director. The program began accepting students in 1992, and after Pea became Dean the program directorship was taken over by Brian Reiser.

The Journal of the Learning Sciences was first published in 1991, with Janet Kolodner as founding editor. Yasmin Kafai and Cindy Hmelo-Silver took over as editors in 2009. The International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning was established as a separate journal in 2006, edited by Gerry Stahl and Freiderich Hesse.

The first biennial meeting of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences took place at Northwestern University in 1994. The International Society of the Learning Sciences was established in 2002.

What distinguishes the Learning Sciences from other related fields?

By integrating multiple fields, the Learning Sciences extends beyond other closely related fields in distinguishable ways. For example, the Learning Sciences extends beyond psychology, in that it also accounts for, as well as contributes to computational, sociological and anthropological approaches to the study of learning. Similarly, the Learning Sciences draws inspiration from Cognitive Science, and is regarded as a branch of cognitive science; however, it gives particular attention to improving education through the study, modification, and creation of various interacting and emergent factors that potentially influence the learning of humans.

It is common for Learning Sciences researchers to employ Design-Based Research methodology. The growing acceptance of Design-Based Research methodology as a means for study is often viewed as another way in which Learning Sciences can be distinguished from many of the fields that contribute to it. By including Design-Based Research within its methodological toolkit, Learning Sciences qualifies as a Design Science, with characteristics in common with other Design Sciences that employ Design Science (methodology) such as engineering and computer science.

However, it should be emphasized Design-Based Research research methodology is by no means the only research methodology used in the field. Rather, computational modeling, experimental and quasi-experimental research, and non-interventionist ethnographic-style qualitative research methodologies have long been and continue to be employed in Learning Sciences.

Associations and Journals

Major Research Centers

Alphabetical Listing of Graduate Programs that Specialize in the Learning Sciences

See also

References

  1. ^ Clark, R., Nguyen, F., and Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load. San Francisco: Pfeiffer. ISBN 0-7879-7728-4.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ Mayer, R. E. (1998). "A Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning: Implications for Design Principles" (PDF). {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (1999). "Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity". Journal of Educational Psychology. 91: 358–368. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-52178-749-1.
  • Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5-11.
  • Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178
  • Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In K. Sawyer (ed.) Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 79–96), Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner and R. Calfee (Eds.) Handbook of Educational Psychology, (pp. 15–46). New York: MacMillan.
  • Lave, J. (1996). The practice of learning: The problem with "context." In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.) Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp.3–32). Boston , MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In K. Sawyer (ed.) Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 79–96), Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.