Jump to content

Hochstetter's frog

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Leiopelma hochstetteri)

Hochstetter's frog

Declining (NZ TCS)[1]
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Amphibia
Order: Anura
Family: Leiopelmatidae
Genus: Leiopelma
Species:
L. hochstetteri
Binomial name
Leiopelma hochstetteri
Range (does not show Maungatautari)

Hochstetter's frog or Hochstetter's New Zealand frog (Leiopelma hochstetteri)[3] is a primitive frog native to New Zealand, one of only four extant species belonging to the taxonomic family Leiopelmatidae. They possess some of the most ancient features of any extant frogs in the world.

Taxonomy

[edit]

Hochstetter's frog is named after the Austrian geologist Ferdinand von Hochstetter.[4] This species is endemic to New Zealand and belongs to the most primitive anuran suborder Archaeobatrachia, along with Archey's frog (Leiopelma archeyi), Hamilton's frog (L. hamiltoni), and the Maud Island frog (L. pakeka). Three species within the genus, L. auroraensis, L. markhami, and L. waitomoensis, are extinct.[5]

Description

[edit]

Hochstetter's frog has a brown-green to brown-red top with dark bands and warts, yellow-brown bellies. Males grow to 38 mm (1.5 in) and females 50 mm (2.0 in) snout–vent length. They are nocturnal, staying under refugia during the day. Hochstetter's frog prefers moist gaps under shaded debris, like rocks and logs and along streams and seepages in native temperate rainforest.[6] They are carnivorous, preying on invertebrates such as spiders, beetles, and mites.[7] All native New Zealand frogs (pepeketua in Māori) share tail-wagging muscles, inscriptional ribs, round pupils, and a lack of eardrums, eustachian tubes, and vocal sacs. These frogs, in some ways more similar to salamanders than modern frogs, use chemical signals over acoustic signals to mark habitat and recognize competitors.[8] Hochstetter's frogs poor hearing is complemented by their lack of vocalization.

Lifecycle

[edit]

Hochstetter's frogs can live to 30 years old. Adults do not breed until they are three years old, laying up to 20 eggs each season.[9] While all four species develop as tadpoles inside the egg, hatching as froglets with developed back legs, Hochstetter's frogs, as the only semiaquatic species, continue to develop in water while the three other species are cared for by their parents.[9]

Distribution

[edit]

Subfossil remains indicate all native species were once widespread across New Zealand until roughly 200 years ago.[10] Hochstetter's frogs have the most extensive distribution of the native frogs, spanning the upper North Island, including the Waitākere and Hunua Ranges, the Coromandel Peninsula, Great Barrier Island, Maungatautari Ecological Island, and the East Coast.[11] Ten populations of this species have been found to be genetically distinct, owing to the history of glacial isolation.[12]

Currently the species survives in fragmented populations across the North Island between Whangārei and the Waikato Region, and can also be found on Great Barrier Island.[13]

Threats

[edit]

Invasive species like rats, goats, and pigs have caused declines in the species' population.[2][6] The kiore, or Polynesian rat, was brought to New Zealand by the Māori, causing extinction on the South Island and large-scale destruction of populations on the North Island during the last millennium.[14] Rats and stoats are known to kill Hochstetter's frogs.[15] Predators known to predate other frog species in New Zealand, such as pigs, cats, hedgehogs and ferrets,[15] are also likely to have an impact. Introduced browsers, such as goats and pigs, have been thought erode habitat along streams and reduce the amount of vegetation providing shade. Habitat modification and destruction has been paramount in reducing populations. Local mining can cause sediment runoff that reduces stream quality and can even poison frogs. Logging and the resulting forest clearing can pose similar issues to stream quality. The global chytrid fungus epidemic has caused steep declines in Archey's frog populations and is thought to pose a threat to Hochstetter's frogs, as well.[2][5][6]

Conservation

[edit]

Under the New Zealand Threat Classification scheme, Hochsetter's frog is listed as “At risk–Declining”.[5][1] The IUCN has classified the species as “Least Concern”.[2] All native frogs are protected under the New Zealand Wildlife Management Act of 1953. The Kokako Management Area in the northern Hunua Ranges has been undergoing pest control since 1994 to provide suitable habitat for the conservation of kokako, an endangered forest bird. Surveys of Hochstetter's frogs in the area have shown numbers of young frogs have jumped from 10% to 30% in 2005.[16]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Rhys J. Burns; Ben D. Bell; Amanda Haigh; et al. (August 2018). Conservation status of New Zealand amphibians, 2017 (PDF). Vol. 25. pp. 1–11. ISBN 978-1-98-851468-0. ISSN 2324-1713. Wikidata Q105980883. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
  2. ^ a b c d IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group (2015). "Leiopelma hochstetteri". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2015: e.T11452A66654724. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T11452A66654724.en. Retrieved 19 November 2021.
  3. ^ a b Frost, Darrel R. (2016). "Leiopelma hochstetteri Fitzinger, 1861". Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History. Retrieved 6 January 2017.
  4. ^ Beolens, Bo; Watkins, Michael; Grayson, Michael (22 April 2013). The Eponym Dictionary of Amphibians. Pelagic Publishing. p. 95. ISBN 978-1-907807-42-8.
  5. ^ a b c Newman, Donald G.; Bell, Ben D.; Bishop, Phillip J.; Burns, Rhys; Haigh, Amanda; Hitchmough, Rodney A.; Tocher, Mandy (June 2010). "Conservation status of New Zealand frogs, 2009". New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 37 (2): 121–130. doi:10.1080/03014221003685856. S2CID 85054356.
  6. ^ a b c "Hochstetter's Frog/Pepeketua (Leiopelma hochstetteri)" (PDF). Factsheet. Auckland Council. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  7. ^ Shaw, S.D.; L.F. Skerratt; R. Kleinpaste; L. Daglish; P.J. Bishop (2012). "Designing a diet for captive native frogs from the analysis of stomach contents from free-ranging Leiopelma". New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 39 (1): 47–56. doi:10.1080/03014223.2011.619989.
  8. ^ Waldman, B.; P.J. Bishop (2003). "Chemical communication in an archaic anuran amphibian". Behavioral Ecology. 15 (1): 88–93. doi:10.1093/beheco/arg071. hdl:10.1093/beheco/arg071.
  9. ^ a b Wilson, K-J (2004). Flight of the Huia. Christchurch: Canterbury University Press.
  10. ^ Worthy, T.H. (1987). "Osteology of Leiopelma (Amphibia: Leiopelmatidae) and descriptions of three new subfossil Leiopelma species". Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 17 (3): 201–251. doi:10.1080/03036758.1987.10418160.
  11. ^ Bishop, P.J. (2013). Native frog (Leiopelma spp.) recovery plan, 2013—2018 (PDF). Vol. Threatened Species Recovery Plan. Department of Conservation, Wellington. 39 pp. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-01-06. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
  12. ^ Gleeson, D; C Clay; N Gemmell; R Howitt; A Haigh (2010). Summary report: Leiopelma hochstetteri population genetic structure. Landcare Research contract report LC 077 for the Department of Conservation (unpublished) (Report). 18 pp.
  13. ^ van Winkel, Dylan; Baling, Marleen; Hitchmough, Rod (2018). Reptiles and Amphibians of New Zealand (1st ed.). Auckland: Auckland University Press. pp. 310–311. ISBN 978-1-86940-937-1. OL 40449345M. Wikidata Q76013985.
  14. ^ Worthy, Trevor H. (1987). "Palaeoecological information concerning members of the frog genus Leiopelma: Leiopelmatidae in New Zealand". Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 17 (4): 409–420. doi:10.1080/03036758.1987.10426482.
  15. ^ a b Egeter, Bastian; Robertson, Bruce C.; Bishop, Philip J. (2015). "A Synthesis of Direct Evidence of Predation on Amphibians in New Zealand, in the Context of Global Invasion Biology". Herpetological Review. 46: 512–519.
  16. ^ Knill, K (26 October 2005). "Native frogs in the Hunua on the increase". Archived from the original on 28 September 2006. Retrieved 5 January 2017.