Jump to content

List of representations of e

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.18.34.94 (talk) at 06:40, 10 September 2007 (As an infinite series). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The mathematical constant e can be represented in a variety of ways as a real number. Since e is an irrational number (see proof that e is irrational), it cannot be represented as a fraction, but it can be represented as a continued fraction. Using calculus, e may also be represented as an infinite series, infinite product, or other sort of limit of a sequence.

As a continued fraction

The number e can be represented as an infinite simple continued fraction (sequence A003417 in the OEIS):

Here are some infinite generalized continued fraction expansions of e. The second of these can be generated from the first by a simple equivalence transformation. The third one – with ... 6, 10, 14, ... in it – converges very quickly.



Setting m=x and n=2 yields

As an infinite series

The number e is also equal to the sum of the following infinite series:

[1]
where is the Bell number.

As an infinite product

The number e is also given by several infinite product forms including Pippenger's product

and Guillera's product [2]

where the nth factor is the nth root of the product

as well as the infinite product

As the limit of a sequence

The number e is equal to the limit of several infinite sequences:

and
(both by Stirling's formula).

The symmetric limit,

[3]

may be obtained by manipulation of the basic limit definition of e. Another limit is

[4]

where is the nth prime and is the primorial of the nth prime.

Finally, the famous sentence:

Notes

  1. ^ Formulas 2-7: H. J. Brothers, Improving the convergence of Newton's series approximation for e. The College Mathematics Journal, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2004; pages 34-39.
  2. ^ J. Sondow, A faster product for pi and a new integral for ln pi/2, Amer. Math. Monthly 112 (2005) 729-734.
  3. ^ H. J. Brothers and J. A. Knox, New closed-form approximations to the Logarithmic Constant e. The Mathematical Intelligencer, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1998; pages 25-29.
  4. ^ S. M. Ruiz 1997