Minister of Safety & Security v Van Duivenboden

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Veryproicelandic (talk | contribs) at 07:09, 16 September 2018 (added some links, removed that flag, cleaned up the syntax...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In Minister of Safety & Security v Van Duivenboden, an important case in the South African law of delict and South African criminal law, the Supreme Court of Appeal held that, while private citizens may be entitled to remain passive when the constitutional rights of other citizens are threatened, the State has a positive constitutional duty, imposed by section 7 of the Constitution, to act in protection of the rights in the Bill of Rights. The existence of this duty necessarily implies accountability. Where the state, represented by persons who perform its functions, acts in conflict with section 7, the norm of accountability must of necessity assume an important role in determining whether or not a legal duty ought to be recognized in any particular case.

See also

References

  • Minister of Safety and Security v Van Duivenboden 2002 (87) SA 431 (SCA).