Jump to content

Nonclassical light

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Interferometrist (talk | contribs) at 11:45, 18 October 2016 (top: Quantum noise is NOT a feature of non-classical light but of all light due to the quantization of energy in the electromagnetic field). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Nonclassical light is light that cannot be described using classical electromagnetism; its characteristics are described by the quantized electromagnetic field and quantum mechanics.

Most common described forms of nonclassical light are the following:

  • Squeezed light exhibits reduced noise in one quadrature component. The most familiar kinds of squeezed light have either reduced amplitude noise or reduced phase noise, with increased noise of the other component.
  • Fock states (also called photon number states) have a well-defined number of photons (stored e.g. in a cavity), while the phase is totally undefined.

Glauber–Sudarshan P representation

It has been shown that the density matrix for any state of light can be written as:

where is a coherent state. A classical state of light is one in which is a probability density function. If it is not, the state is said to be nonclassical.[1]

Aspects of that would make it nonclassical are:

The matter is not quite simple. According to Mandel and Wolf: "The different coherent states are not [mutually] orthogonal, so that even if behaved like a true probability density [function], it would not describe probabilities of mutually exclusive states."[1]

References

Citations

  1. ^ a b Mandel & Wolf 1995, p. 541

Citation bibliography

Mandel, L.; Wolf, E. (1995), Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics, Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-41711-2 {{citation}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |chapterurl= and |month= (help)

General references

  • R. J. Glauber, “Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field”, Phys. Rev. 131 (6), 2766 (1963)