Jump to content

Pólya conjecture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot 1 (talk | contribs) at 06:49, 16 June 2011 ([Pu356]+: jfm, mr, issue, jstor.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Summatory Liouville function L(n) up to n = 107. The readily visible oscillations are due to the first non-trivial zero of the Riemann zeta function.
Closeup of the summatory Liouville function L(n) in the region where the Pólya conjecture fails to hold.
Logarithmic graph of the summatory Liouville function L(n) up to n = 2 × 109. The green bar shows the failure of the conjecture; the blue curve shows the oscillatory contribution of the first Riemann zero.

In number theory, the Pólya conjecture stated that 'most' (i.e. more than 50%) of the natural numbers less than any given number have an odd number of prime factors. The conjecture was posited by the Hungarian mathematician George Pólya in 1919,[1] and proved false in 1958. The size of the smallest counter-example is often used to show how a conjecture can be true for many numbers, and still be false.

Statement

Pólya's conjecture states that for any n (> 1), if we partition the natural numbers less than or equal to n (excluding 0) into those with an odd number of prime factors, and those with an even number of prime factors, then the former set has more members than the latter set, or the same number of members. (Repeated prime factors are counted the requisite number of times—thus 24 = 23 × 31 has 3 + 1 = 4 factors i.e. an even number of factors, while 30 = 2 × 3 × 5 has 3 factors, i.e. an odd number of factors.)

Equivalently, it can be stated in terms of the summatory Liouville function, the conjecture being that

for all n > 1. Here, λ(k) = (−1)Ω(k) is positive if the number of prime factors of the integer k is even, and is negative if it is odd. The big Omega function counts the total number of prime factors of an integer.

Disproof

Pólya's conjecture was disproven by C. B. Haselgrove in 1958. He showed that the conjecture has a counterexample, which he estimated to be around 1.845 × 10361.[2]

An explicit counterexample, of n = 906,180,359 was given by R. Sherman Lehman in 1960;[3] the smallest counterexample is n = 906,150,257, found by Minoru Tanaka in 1980.[4]

The Pólya conjecture fails to hold for most values of n in the region of 906,150,257 ≤ n ≤ 906,488,079. In this region, the Liouville function reaches a maximum value of 829 at n = 906,316,571.

Notes

  1. ^ Pólya, G. (1919). "Verschiedene Bemerkungen zur Zahlentheorie". Jahresbericht der deutschen Math.-Vereinigung. 28: 31–40. JFM 47.0882.06.
  2. ^ Haselgrove, C.B. (1958). "A disproof of a conjecture of Pólya". Mathematika. 5 (02): 141–145. doi:10.1112/S0025579300001480. MR 0104638.
  3. ^ Lehman, R. S. (1960). "On Liouville's function". Mathematics of Computation. 14 (72). Mathematics of Computation, Vol. 14, No. 72: 311–320. doi:10.2307/2003890. JSTOR 2003890. MR 0120198.
  4. ^ Tanaka, M. (1980). "A Numerical Investigation on Cumulative Sum of the Liouville Function". Tokyo Journal of Mathematics. 3 (1): 187–189. doi:10.3836/tjm/1270216093. MR 0584557.

References