Jump to content

Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Cromwell

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Homagetocatalonia (talk | contribs) at 21:26, 22 March 2016 (Error on my part.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is a list of all the reasons written by Thomas Cromwell during his tenure as puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada.

2014

2013

  • R. v. Ryan, 2013 SCC 3 (Majority, co-written by LeBel)
  • R. v. Named Person B, 2013 SCC 9 (Dissent)
  • Antrim Truck Centre Ltd. v. Ontario (Transportation), 2013 SCC 13 (Unanimous)
  • R. v. TELUS Communications Co., 2013 SCC 16 (Dissent)

2012

  • Merck Frosst Canada Ltd. v. Canada (Health), 2012 SCC 3 (Majority)
  • Richard v. Time Inc., 2012 SCC 8 (Unanimous, co-written with LeBel)
  • Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission), 2012 SCC 10 (Unanimous)
  • R. v. Roy, 2012 SCC 26 (Unanimous)
  • Annapolis County District School Board v. Marshall, 2012 SCC 27 (Dissent)
  • Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Canada (Public Works and Government Services), 2012 SCC 29 (unanimous)
  • Canada (Attorney General) v. Downtown East Side Sex Workers United Against Violence Society et al., 2012 SCC 45 (Unanimous)
  • R. v. Rochon, 2012 SCC 50 (Dissent)
  • R. v. Boudreault, 2012 SCC 56 (Dissent)
  • R. v. Dineley, 2012 SCC 58 (Dissent)
  • Reference re Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-167 and Broadcasting Order CRTC 2010-168, 2012 SCC 68 (Dissent, co-written by Abella)

2011

  • R. v. Miljevic, 2011 SCC 8, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 203 (Majority)
  • Kerr v. Baranow, 2011 SCC 10, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 269 (Unanimous)
  • Bastien Estate v. Canada, 2011 SCC 38, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 710 (Majority)
  • Dubé v. Canada, 2011 SCC 39, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 764 (Majority)
  • R. v. J.M.H., 2011 SCC 45, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 197 (Unanimous)
  • R. v. Côté, 2011 SCC 46, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 215 (Majority)
  • Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 53 (Unanimous, co-written by LeBel)
  • Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. Alberta Teachers’ Association, 2011 SCC 61 (Concurrence)
  • L.M.P. v. L.S., 2011 SCC 64 (Concurrence)
  • R.P. v. R.C., 2011 SCC 65 (Concurrence)

2010

  • Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44 (Unanimous)
  • Tercon Contractors Ltd. v. British Columbia (Transportation and Highways), 2010 SCC 4, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 69 (Majority)
  • Fullowka v. Pinkerton's of Canada, 2010 SCC 5, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 132 (Unanimous)
  • Reference re Broome v. Prince Edward Island, 2010 SCC 11, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 360 (Unanimous)
  • R. v. Hurley, 2010 SCC 18, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 637 (Unanimous, co-written by Rothstein)
  • R. v. Cornell, 2010 SCC 31, [2010] 2 S.C.R. 142 (Majority)
  • Németh v. Canada (Justice), 2010 SCC 56 (Unanimous)
  • Gavrila v. Canada (Justice), 2010 SCC 57 (Unanimous)
  • Reference re Assisted Human Reproduction Act, 2010 SCC 61 (Plurality)

2009

  • R. v. Strecko, 2009 SCC 2, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 64
  • R. v. Middleton, 2009 SCC 21 (Dissent)
  • R. v. Van, 2009 SCC 22 (Dissent)
  • R. v. Godin, 2009 SCC 26 (Majority)
  • R. v. Layton, 2009 SCC 36, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 540 (Dissent)
  • Galambos v. Perez, 2009 SCC 48, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 247 (Unanimous)
  • R. v. Burke, 2009 SCC 57, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 566 (Dissent)

* Note: This table is complete up until April 3, 2013

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reasons_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_by_Justice_Cromwell&oldid=711431938"