Rokhlin lemma
In mathematics, the Rokhlin lemma, or Kakutani–Rokhlin lemma is an important result in ergodic theory. It states that an aperiodic measure preserving dynamical system can be decomposed to an arbitrary high tower of measurable sets and a remainder of arbitrarily small measure. It was proven by Vladimir Abramovich Rokhlin and independently by Shizuo Kakutani. The lemma is used extensively in ergodic theory, for example in Ornstein theory and has many generalizations.
Terminology
Rokhlin lemma belongs to the group mathematical statements such as Zorn's lemma in set theory and Schwarz lemma in complex analysis which are traditionally called lemmas despite the fact that their roles in their respective fields are fundamental.
Statement of the lemma
Lemma: Let be an invertible measure-preserving transformation on a standard measure space with . We assume is (measurably) aperiodic, that is, the set of periodic points for has zero measure. Then for every integer and for every , there exists a measurable set such that the sets are pairwise disjoint and such that
A useful strengthening of the lemma states that given a finite measurable partition , then may be chosen in such a way that and are independent for all .[1]
A topological version of the lemma
Let be a topological dynamical system consisting of a compact metric space and a homeomorphism . The topological dynamical system is called minimal if it has no proper non-empty closed -invariant subsets. It is called (topologically) aperiodic if it has no periodic points ( for some and implies ). A topological dynamical system is called a factor of if there exists a continuous surjective mapping which is equivariant, i.e., for all .
Elon Lindenstrauss proved the following theorem:[2]
Theorem: Let be a topological dynamical system which has an aperiodic minimal factor. Then for integer there is a continuous function such that the set satisfies are pairwise disjoint.
Gutman proved the following theorem:[3]
Theorem: Let be a topological dynamical system which has an aperiodic factor with the small boundary property. Then for every , there exists a continuous function such that the set satisfies , where denotes orbit capacity.
Further generalizations
- There is a version for non-invertible measure preserving systems.[4]
- Donald Ornstein and Benjamin Weiss proved a version for free actions by countable discrete amenable groups.[5]
- Carl Linderholm proved a version for periodic non-singular transformations.[6]
References
- ^ Shields, Paul (1973). The theory of Bernoulli shifts (PDF). Chicago Lectures in Mathematics. Chicago, Illinois and London: The University of Chicago Press. pp. Chapter 3.
- ^ Lindenstrauss, Elon (1999-12-01). "Mean dimension, small entropy factors and an embedding theorem". Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS. 89 (1): 227–262. doi:10.1007/BF02698858. ISSN 0073-8301.
- ^ Gutman, Yonatan. "Embedding ℤk-actions in cubical shifts and ℤk-symbolic extensions." Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 31.2 (2011): 383-403.
- ^ "Isaac Kornfeld. Some old and new rokhlin towers. Contemporary Mathematics%2C 356%3A145%2C 2004. – Google Scholar". scholar.google.co.il. Retrieved 2015-09-21.
- ^ Ornstein, Donald S.; Weiss, Benjamin (1987-12-01). "Entropy and isomorphism theorems for actions of amenable groups". Journal d’Analyse Mathématique. 48 (1): 1–141. doi:10.1007/BF02790325. ISSN 0021-7670.
- ^ Tulcea, A. Ionescu (1965-01-01). "On the Category of Certain Classes of Transformations in Ergodic Theory". Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 114 (1): 261–279. doi:10.2307/1994001. JSTOR 1994001.
Notes
- V. Rokhlin. A "general" measure-preserving transformation is not mixing. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR (N.S.), 60:349–351, 1948.
- Shizuo Kakutani. Induced measure preserving transformations. Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo, 19:635–641, 1943.
- Benjamin Weiss. On the work of V. A. Rokhlin in ergodic theory. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 9(4):619–627, 1989.
- Isaac Kornfeld. Some old and new rokhlin towers. Contemporary Mathematics, 356:145, 2004.
See also
Rokhlin's lemma should not be confused with Rokhlin's theorem.