Jump to content

Ross v. Blake

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Legalskeptic (talk | contribs) at 17:44, 15 September 2018 (removed link template from lead citation per WP:SCOTUS/SG; citation tweaks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Ross v. Blake
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued March 29, 2016
Decided June 6, 2016
Full case nameMichael Ross, Petitioner v. Shaidon Blake
Docket no.15–339
Citations578 U.S. ___ (more)
136 S. Ct. 1850; 195 L. Ed. 2d 117
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Holding
The Prison Litigation Reform Act’s requirement to exhaust administrative remedies does not have a “special circumstances” exception.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityKagan, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Alito, Sotomayor
ConcurrenceThomas
ConcurrenceBreyer
Laws applied
Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995

Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995.[1][2]

Opinion of the Court

Associate Justice Elena Kagan authored the majority opinion.[2]

References

  1. ^ SCOTUSblog coverage
  2. ^ a b Ross v. Blake, No. 15–339, 578 U.S. ___ (2016).


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ross_v._Blake&oldid=859693920"