Selkirkia

Selkirkia; Temporal range: Cambrian Stage 3–Middle Cambrian PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N
	Selkirkia columbia fossil from the Burgess Shale. From Smith et al. (2015)
	Restoration of Selkirkia columbia
Scientific classification
Domain:	Eukaryota
Kingdom:	Animalia
Stem group:	Priapulida (?)
Class:	†Archaeopriapulida
Family:	†Selkirkiidae; Conway Morris, 1977
Genus:	†Selkirkia; Walcott, 1911
Species
	Selkirkia columbia Conway Morris, 1977; Selkirkia elongata Luo & Hu, 1999; Selkirkia sinica Luo & Hu, 1999; Selkirkia spencei Resser, 1939; Selkirkia willoughbyi Conway Morris & Robison, 1986;

Selkirkia is a genus of predatory,^[3] tubicolous priapulid worm known from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale, Ogygopsis Shale and Puncoviscana Formation.^[4] Template:Gpb abundance In the Burgess Shale, 20% of the tapering, organic-walled tubes are preserved with the worm inside them, whereas the other 80% are empty (or sometimes occupied by one or more small agnostid trilobites).^[3] Whilst alive, the tubes were probably vertical, whereas trilobite-occupied tubes are horizontal.^[3]

Morphology

Selkirkia had a body divisible into a proboscis towards the anterior of a trunk enclosed by a tube. The proboscis would have been partially invertable and was armed with several spinules and spines, decreasing size distally overall. It was controlled by at least two sets of anterior retractor muscles. Immediately behind the proboscis was the trunk, smooth for the most part but lined with papillae towards the anterior. Surrounding the trunk was the tube, which way very finely annulated (4 annulations per 0.1 millimeters).

History

Members Cambrorhytium were originally described as Selkirkia before their identification as a separate genus.^[5]

External links

Template:Burgess Shale species

References

^ Conway Morris, S (1977). "Fossil priapulid worms". Special papers in Palaeontology. 20.
^ Smith, M. R.; Harvey, T. H. P.; Butterfield, N. J. (2015). "The macro- and microfossil record of the Cambrian priapulid Ottoia". Palaeontology. 58: 705–721. doi:10.1111/pala.12168.
^ ^a ^b ^c Chatterton, B. D. E.; Collins, D. H.; Ludvigsen, R. (2003). "Cryptic behaviour in trilobites: Cambrian and Silurian examples from Canada, and other related occurrences". In Lane, P. D; Siveter, D. J; Fortey, R. A (eds.). Trilobites and Their Relatives. Special Papers in Palaeontology. Vol. 70. The Palaeontological Association. pp. 157–173. ISBN 978-0-901702-81-4.
^ Aceñolaza, Florencio; Guillermo, Aceñolaza (2005). "La formación Puncoviscana y unidades estratigráficas vinculadas en el neoproterozoico - Cámbrico temprano del noroeste argentino" (PDF). Latin American Journal of Sedimentology and Basin Analysis (in Spanish). 12 (2). Asociación Argentina de Sedimentología: 65–87. Retrieved 7 December 2015.
^ See Cambrorhytium.

This article related to a Cambrian animal is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

[SCM1977-1] Conway Morris, S (1977). "Fossil priapulid worms". Special papers in Palaeontology. 20.

[2] Smith, M. R.; Harvey, T. H. P.; Butterfield, N. J. (2015). "The macro- and microfossil record of the Cambrian priapulid Ottoia". Palaeontology. 58: 705–721. doi:10.1111/pala.12168.

[Chatterton2003-3] Chatterton, B. D. E.; Collins, D. H.; Ludvigsen, R. (2003). "Cryptic behaviour in trilobites: Cambrian and Silurian examples from Canada, and other related occurrences". In Lane, P. D; Siveter, D. J; Fortey, R. A (eds.). Trilobites and Their Relatives. Special Papers in Palaeontology. Vol. 70. The Palaeontological Association. pp. 157–173. ISBN 978-0-901702-81-4.

[Acenolaza2005-4] Aceñolaza, Florencio; Guillermo, Aceñolaza (2005). "La formación Puncoviscana y unidades estratigráficas vinculadas en el neoproterozoico - Cámbrico temprano del noroeste argentino" (PDF). Latin American Journal of Sedimentology and Basin Analysis (in Spanish). 12 (2). Asociación Argentina de Sedimentología: 65–87. Retrieved 7 December 2015.

[5] See Cambrorhytium.

[2]

[1]

[3]

[4]

[5]