Jump to content

Snowden v. Hughes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnomieBOT (talk | contribs) at 18:36, 6 June 2016 (Substing templates: {{scite}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Snowden v. Hughes
Argued December 13, 1943
Decided January 17, 1944
Full case nameJoseph Snowden v. Edward J. Hughes and Louie E. Louis
Citations321 U.S. 1 (more)
Case history
Prior132 F.2d 476 (7th Cir.), cert. granted, 319 U.S. 738.
Holding
The Fourteenth Amendment does not protect rights pertinent solely to state citizenship, and the equal protection clause does not protect citizens from unfair applications of fair state laws where purposeful discrimination is absent.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Harlan F. Stone
Associate Justices
Owen Roberts · Hugo Black
Stanley F. Reed · Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas · Frank Murphy
Robert H. Jackson · Wiley B. Rutledge
Case opinions
MajorityStone, joined by Rutledge, Frankfurter
DissentDouglas, joined by Murphy
Laws applied
United States Constitution, Amendment XIV

Snowden v. Hughes, 321 U.S. 1 (1944), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution does not protect rights pertinent solely to state citizenship, and that the equal protection clause does not protect citizens from unfair applications of fair state laws where purposeful discrimination is absent.

References

External links

  • Text of Snowden v. Hughes, 321 U.S. 1 (1944) is available from: Findlaw  Justia