Talk:Corporate trainer

Added Neutral Point of View template, May 2009. Article shows significant unsupported bias about corporate trainers needing to come from inside a company - regardless of truth, it's borderline off-topic and currently takes up approximately a third of the article:

In order to effectively support the team, corporate trainers must be engaged with the business of the business they are supporting. In other words, trainers should not operate in a bubble - removed from the realities facing their clients.
In practice, many corporate trainers come into an organization from the outside, may never gain a grasp of what the organization is all about and their advice may be disregarded by members who resist change or distrust the trainer as an outsider. The trainers own personal faults may keep them from building the trust that they can have a significant positive impact.
When the training department and human resources are recognized by the CEO as being fully engaged business partners, they have more opportunities to share their ideas and influence the organization at a much higher level.

Know very little about corporate training myself so will leave edits to the experts! 130.234.201.92 (talk) 20:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In reading the 'definition' of corporate trainer, I've seen that my position has been forgotten. I'm a corporate trainer. I train the people that purchase our product. They are not employees or partners in the company, therefore my position has now opened up a whole new level of CORPORATE TRAINER. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.252.140.138 (talk) 01:40, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Student looking into Corporate Training as a career - Is there more information about this career? How much do they make on average? What other types of Corporate Trainers are there? Is there a certain type of company that uses them or do all major companies have them? What job skills are required/recommended to be a Corporate Trainer? Are Corporate Training position rising or declining in the US? Please provide any other information you might find helpful. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.28.253.119 (talk) 18:53, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:51, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]