Talk:Endless Ages: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m added cover |
Scarmudgeon (talk | contribs) ←Blanked the page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Video games|class=Start|importance=Low|screenshot=yes}} |
|||
The notability criterion concerning games state this: |
|||
: The toy or game has been a subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the game or topic with at least some of these works serving a general audience. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries and reviews. Some of these works should contain sufficient critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a summary of rules or in-game information. |
|||
Now there are several links to reviews on other websites, independent of the game. These include: [http://www.mmorpg.com/gamelist.cfm/game/67 MMORPG.com] and [http://au.pc.ign.com/objects/017/017346.html IGN] just to name two. I believe then that this article meets the criteria of notability, and I will remove the tag tomorrow unless someone else has something to say. --[[User:Josellis|Josellis]] ([[User talk:Josellis|talk]]) 03:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:I honestly don't believe that it meets those criteria. I'm not entirely sure that MMORPG.com qualifies as a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]], and the IGN (which would qualify as reliable, in my opinion) seems ''very'' trivial to me, more of an aside than anything. In addition, neither of those sources serve a "general audience" as required. [[User:Wyatt Riot|Wyatt Riot]] ([[User talk:Wyatt Riot|talk]]) 10:07, 31 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||