Talk:155 mm gun M1

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Shell (projectile)#High-explosive|HE]] Anchor Shell (projectile)#High-explosive links to a specific web page: High explosive. The anchor (#High-explosive) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

A World War II veteran , that died two weeks ago, told me, some years ago, that this weapon was amazing:precise, reliable, long range and available in great numbers.He used it in Italy, between 1944 and 1945.Agre22 (talk) 15:15, 29 August 2008 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Development: Why remove link to Westervelt Board ?

I added a link to the army's page for General Westervelt which includes a few sentences on the army's review of its artillery. The (155 mm gun M1) article still says the M1's development was influenced by the "Westervelt Board" (named in his honor). So why remove the link and claim it is "Not an appropriate link". W102102 (talk) 18:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]