Jump to content

Talk:1877 FA Cup final/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: -- BigDom 19:18, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Generally a well written article, just have a few minor points:

Lead
  • "Oxford has also previously won the tournament" – seems to be in the wrong tense
Route to the final
  • "replay" – could be wikilinked
  • "Wanderers beat the other of the great universities, Cambridge University 1–0" – needs another comma after University
Summary
  • In the last sentence of the first paragraph, the stadium should be named as it is the first mention of it in the section
  • "giving the university team the lead" – in previous mentions, "university" has been capitalised
  • "the cup holders held" – "holders" and then "held" is a bit repetitive
External links
  • If the match report is "inaccurate", there doesn't seem to be much point linking to it

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Also, I have added this review to my watchlist. Thanks, -- BigDom 20:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:30, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Points addressed - pass with congratulations. -- BigDom 21:55, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]