Talk:Adventure Time season 9/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Figfires (talk · contribs) 19:58, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	The prose couldn't be clearer... Had one verb tense issue that I fixed. Other than that, no spelling or Grammar problems.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	The article complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. No puffery or other items that violate guidelines.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	A long list of references is present at the bottom of the article and these references are appropriately presented.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	All the references appear to be from reliable sources.
	2c. it contains no original research.	No original research was discovered in the article
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	No copyright violations or plagiarism was detected.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	All the main topics are addressed in their respective sections in a level of detail that is appropriate.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	The article does not go into unnecessary detail in the lead or in its various sections.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Does not appear to have any editorial bias in the article. It is written in a pretty neutral tone.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No edit wars or content disputes in recent times.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All images in the article have either a fair usage rationale or a copyright status.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	All the images are relevant to the article's topic. The infobox image is the series cover, one image is of a member of the development team, and the other two are of guest stars.
	7. Overall assessment.	Another great article! I am glad to say this is a good article now.