Talk:Ava–Hanthawaddy War (1401–1403)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Hybernator (talk · contribs) 20:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 04:50, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Peacemaker67: It looks like it's been a month since this review was taken on; just wanted to provide a courtesy ping in case this was forgotten about (I have had my fair share of those.) Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 07:16, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Yes, it had slipped off my radar. I’m back on deck properly on Monday and will attend to it swiftly then. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:27, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- My apologies again. RW stuff getting in the way of my editing! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:36, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Yes, it had slipped off my radar. I’m back on deck properly on Monday and will attend to it swiftly then. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:27, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |
|