Jump to content

Talk:Calvin and Hobbes/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Initial review. :)

Reviewer: km5 (talk) 21:49, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Style and prose up to encyclopedia standards, and consistent throughout the article.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

First pass (prose and style) done as of Aug 19. --km5 (talk) 12:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Completed images review + neutrality check. --km5 (talk) 23:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coverage OK, edit wars none (OK). Unless we have a surprise with references, this article definitely deserves GA status... We'll see! --helianthi (talk) 21:41, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem with this article. Deserves GA standard. --helianthi (talk) 12:06, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]