Talk:Deep
(Redirected from Talk:DEEP)
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
from VfD:
Seems to be mostly nonsense. The only potentially useful info is about the album entitled 'Deep' but even that has too little info to warrant a page. I vote delete. — SimonEast 01:08, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, cleanup, improve - Seems like a good start for a proper disambiguation page. Suitable additions can be gathered from Special:Allpages/Deep & Special:Allpages/The Deep. -- Netoholic @ 01:19, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I disagree--disambig for what? What is there to improve? It's a dicdef combined with an album name, and a redirect to the album name probably isn't the right thing to do. Wikipedia is not a dictionary--that's what the Wiktionary is for, and we need to advertise that more prominently. My vote is to delete (though I'm glad you're making your opinion heard here, Netholic, rather than electing to eliminate VfD altogether.) --Ardonik.talk() 01:29, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)
- I've done some clean-up. It is not the most complete page, but is far better than some. -- Netoholic @ 03:11, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Inspired by your edit, I tried to transform it into a disambig page. But there's not enough information--just an album and the obvious dicdef. If it became a disambig page, the {{wi}} couldn't stay, and that would remove half of the article. Linking to depth, Deep Blue, and whatever only serve to increase the word count. My vote remains delete; there's just nothing to salvage. --Ardonik.talk() 05:03, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)
- I'm impressed by Netaholic's editing, and no longer feel as strongly about deletion. I'm willing for other editors to discuss the options - I don't terribly mind whether it stays or goes. — SimonEast 03:22, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Let a new article on the album arise when it has an editor. The rest is a dictdef, and it's signed. We do not put dictionary definitions in the Wikipedia, and it is highly unlikely that someone needs such a common adjective explained with a soft redirect to Wiktionary. Geogre 02:25, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Keep as separate disambig, ormerge into the disambig at depth and redirect. -Sean Curtin 23:06, Sep 11, 2004 (UTC)- Delete. It only has one actual link, and two 'new' links. Also, to the person who voted just above, how about choosing one or the other?
end moved discussion
Start a discussion about improving the Deep page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Deep" page.
