Talk:Ned Breathitt/GA1
(Redirected from Talk:Edward T. Breathitt/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk) 02:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 02:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- Lots of short paragraphs in the body of the article. Not a huge deal, but would make for smoother reading if some of them were combined.
- Lead "serving from 1963 to 1967. After serving". Repetition.
- Early life, "joined the law firm of Trimble, Soyars, and Breathitt." Did the law firm include the Breathitt name before he joined (was there a family member there?) or was the name added when he joined?
- Breathitt's quest for a revised state constitution is mentioned several times. However, it's never described what he wished changed in the document. Would it be possible to include a brief mention of this, or would that be getting way off topic?
- Later life and death, "law firm of Wyatt, Tarrant, and Combs." Is this Combs any relation to the governor that Breathitt worked under?
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
This is a great article, and I am passing it to GA status. I had a few comments and questions as I was reading through, but they are all very minor, picky things and more FAC-worthy than GAN-worthy, so I am not asking that they be resolved before passing this article. Nice work on another entry in the Kentucky governors series! Dana boomer (talk) 03:03, 18 February 2010 (UTC)