Talk:Founding of Wallachia/GA1
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Foundation of Wallachia/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 14:28, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:32, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Reference #66[1] appears to be an unreliable source.
- a (references):
Done
(the unreliable source is deleted) Borsoka (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- I assume good faith for all off-line sources.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- It appears both broad and focussed.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
File:Terratransalpina.png has no description or author information.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
Done (the map is deleted; otherwise, it is an excellent map which does not contradict to the sources referred to in the article, but I am not in the position to fix it) Borsoka (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Just a few points to be addressed. On Hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:53, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for fixing those point. as you say, it is a pity about the map, but images do need sourcing information. I am haoppy to pass this as a Good Article.
- Pass/Fail: