Talk:Gauge (actress)/Archive 1

Archive 1

Name?

how did she get her name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.44.69 (talk) 03:31, 29 April 2005 (UTC)

Either because someone figured it'd be punny to name a porn starlet after a tool or it's just another random name based on fruit (see dictionary definition of "gage"). -- Ashmodai 08:18, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

If you look at the bottom of her "official site" home page, you'll see that the copyright notice reads ©1998-2006 12 Gauge Entertainment LLC. That's admittedly not a definitive proof of much of anything, but it certainly suggests at the very least that the meaning of "gauge" is associated with shotgun bore rather than fruit size. --Eliyahu S ^Talk 04:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

I discussed this with Gauge, in person, in Kansas City on 2006-11-11. She verified that the name Gauge comes from "12 Gauge (shotgun)". -- kw 09:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Gauge's correct site

The real "official" site is http://www.ilovegauge.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.191.146.42 (talk) 16:53, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Well, the French version of the article says displays a different site: http://www.xxxgauge.com/ which looks a LOT more professional! And it really seems the official site. --Vlad 23:53, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

There is only one official site and that's www.ilovegauge.com. She even mentions it interviews. --† Ðy§ep§ion † 04:26, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Unprofessional or not (and I do agree, as a web developer, that the official site DOES look awfully unprofessional), the site even has a video of Gauge herself stating that this is her official website and all other sources (interviews, etc) indicate the same. Most commercial rip-offs of porn sites look very professional (well, as professional as ordinary commercial pornsites tend to look, which is to say, not very, just expensive and cookie-cut), but having the actress herself state it's their website is as good as it can get. -- Ashmodai 18:16, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

My major concern with ilovegauge.com is that it's unprofessionalism seems to extend beyond where it should. Notice that after the intro the main picture on the right hand side is so badly cropped as to be laughable. Could the audio feed from the intro video have been dubbed? I guess we'll have to wait for someone to join both and check them out... (Didn't log in--Petey) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.239.222.95 (talk) 15:50, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

I know a porn video of her telling the listener to visit her website (ilovegauge.com) 88.134.229.32 17:31, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I discussed this with Gauge, in person, on 2006-11-11 in Kansas City. She explained that the only two real, "official" Gauge domains / websites are http://www.ilovegauge.com/ and http://www.gaugearmy.com/. xxxgauge.com simply had a contract with Gauge a couple years ago, and they maintain a website with the old content that they own. If you look at the index.php page on xxxgauge.com, you'll notice a reference to a movie entitled "Chapter X" that she "just shot". That movie was released over two years ago, so the content on xxxgauge is obviously very dated. --kw 09:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Original research. 98.148.182.33 (talk) 20:18, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Sources?

There are several items in this article that I think are very questionable, such as the claim some people thought Gauge was underage when she started out in porn. I've never heard this rumor before. Also, what is the source of the information that Gauge picked the name "Gauge" to insinuate a 12-gauge shotgun? CJ 08:15, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Picture

Does anyone else notice that on the picture, Gauge's areolae seem visible, particularly on her left breast? Not a prude or anything, but wondering if that might be a violation of Wikipedia policy of some sort. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.93.144.171 (talk) 10:23, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia is WP:NOT censored. —Nightstallion (?) 13:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

But is the content appropriate and necessary to the article though? I got the idea that notation was far more about relevant pictures that some might find offensive in their proper articles though. Pornography, sure. Nipples, sure. A person who happens to be a porn star... it kind of opens the door for Wikipedia the porn site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.93.144.171 (talk) 06:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Please sign your comments. And if you can find a better free picture, please, replace this one. And no, it doesn't really open the door to be a porn site. --Golbez 08:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, the most appropriate picture would probably be one of her patented anal sex handstand position, so the prudes really ought to be happy with the current pic.  ;) --kw 09:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

You can always crop it to show just her face, seems like a simple, common sense solution. Tolstoy143 - "Quos vult perdere dementat" (talk) 03:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

There's no reason to crop it and, while it has been released under the Creative Commons License, there is no reason to modify something without a good reason to do so. A porn star's areola is not one. - 24.23.37.62 (talk) 06:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Really now? Check out the article on areola, or even nipple. I think the picture of Gauge is perfectly suitable for her Wikipedia page. EchetusXe (talk) 15:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

It would in fact be detrimental to the quality of this article to crop out a partially visible areola; Gauge is a pornographic actress, and as such, her body is just as important to depict as her face. I would consider it quite appropriate to have a fully nude pic in the article, given one with a free license. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 23:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 16:13, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

First Appearance???

Can someone please add the name of the film or website that is her first scene? ...seems important. Karacter0 (talk) 21:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

IMDB says YA 19 (2000) ... ever hear of Google? 98.148.182.33 (talk) 20:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Gauge's divorce

According to her MySpace page, she is now divorced and planning to work as a make-up artist in Arkansas.67.150.4.178 (talk) 23:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

not really, it says:

"'Hey everyone! Sorry I haven't been on here in awhile. For those of you who don't know, I recently went through a divorce. (December) I had to take time to clear my head, find myself, and come to understand somethings without any outside influences! I'm sure you all understand.'"

"'Since then, I've went to school in Burbank and became a makeup artist! And I'm currently back in Arkansas doing what I love. I appreciate all your support and understanding as this is still a very sensitive matter for me. Thank you for all your concerned emails and encouraging words!'"

it is WP:SYNTHESIS to state that she is planning to work as a makeup artist. "Doing what I love" is much more likely to be some sort of sex entertainment/sex art or whatever the polite term for her work is. 98.148.182.33 (talk) 20:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC)