Talk:Navy SEALs (video game)/GA1
(Redirected from Talk:Navy SEALS (video game)/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 15:54, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Will review later on or tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:55, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- Perhaps change " in 1991" to "the following year" to avoid repetition in lede?
- "Mancunian " is probably not ideal for a global audience, English should be fine.
- Removed "Mancunian" as a whole JAGUAR 15:48, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- " in "transforming" the British video games industry into a "real multi-national business"." -quoting looks strange here.
- "However, the other reviewer criticised the game's hard difficulty.[11] Robert Swan of Computer and Video Games criticised the playability of the ZX Spectrum version, calling it "less playable" due to its presentation in monochrome and hard difficulty. Reviewing the GX4000 port, however, Swann praised the "colourful" graphics, however he expressed scepticism over the difficulty." -a lot of howevers!
- I fixed it myself.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
@Dr. Blofeld: thanks for the review! Sorry I had to leave this abruptly, but I've fixed the funny looking quotations now. I searched through the scans and couldn't find anything related to elevators or "lifts", as I definitely would have mentioned that in the article if they did. JAGUAR 15:28, 20 January 2016 (UTC)