Talk:Océan class ironclad/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Skinny87 (talk) 07:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Fourth paragraph of the Armament section is a fragment, and should be up-merged to previous paragraph.
    Is Kronstadt the name of a ship, or did you mean to wikilink it instead to the port?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    First paragraph of Armament section is uncited.
    Can you put the single-use cites into the References for consistency?
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:

A couple of minor points to clarify, and then this can be passed. Skinny87 (talk) 07:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Wow, I didn't expect another batch of reviews so quickly; it will be slim pickings from here on out, I'm afraid.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)