Talk:Parsurameswara Temple/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hamiltonstone (talk · contribs) 13:01, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Generally excellent article. It is neutral, stable, and fairly comprehensive. Images are appropriately licenced. I have copyedited it where i was clear about the intended meaning. Other points:

At one point we have "the sanctum, called vimana," and at another "The sanctum (garbhagriha)". It can't be both - something needs fixing.

I have removed garbhagriha to make it consistent.

"the walls are mottled by portions" - what?? Neither the use of "mottled" nor "portions" makes sense here. Can someone check this out?

rephrased

Final section has "...prove the existence of Natyasastra tradition during the times." There need to be at least a few words explaining what this tradition is - a wikilink is not sufficient. Also specify during which times.

Good point - I had a wrong denotion here - it was Devadasi tradition, whose existence is insisted. I have rephrased the section.

I think that's it. hamiltonstone (talk) 13:01, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for taking up the review. Let me fix the items quoted.Ssriram mt (talk) 16:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know for further comments.Ssriram mt (talk) 17:35, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's it. Thank you for the prompt responses. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]