Jump to content

Talk:Sól (Germanic mythology)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    The section on the Merseburg Incantation is unreferenced. Or is this an autoreference, with the naming of the source implying the reference?
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    One reference, and it will pass. Arsenikk (talk) 12:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reviewing the article! I've put the reference in place and made a few adjustments per Lindow's translation. :bloodofox: (talk) 17:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent. In which case I pass the article as Good. Congratulations! Arsenikk (talk) 17:59, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thanks! :bloodofox: (talk) 18:10, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]