Talk:South Dakota-class battleship (1939)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written:
- Not Yet
- The "Development" section should be partitioned into subsections, preferably one for the hull and one for propulsion- just to get rid of the large block of text there.
- Done —Ed (Talk • Say no to drama) 02:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Some of the more obscure nautical terms should be linked. I recommend going through the article and linking to any terms that the average person doesn't immediately recognize.
- The external link needs a title, though with only one link, be sure that it is very useful, otherwise it isn't really necessary.
- Done —Ed (Talk • Say no to drama) 02:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- The "See Also" Section: Isn't there a wikimedia commons template that we can use to link to a page there? It would eliminate another short header.
- Done —Ed (Talk • Say no to drama) 02:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- It is factually accurate and verifiable:
- Pass no problems there.
- It is broad in its coverage:
- Pass no problems there.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy:
- Pass no problems there.
- It is stable:
- Pass no problems there.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
- Not Yet
- The images should be rearranged so they are evenly distributed on both sides. Currently they all seem bunched together on the right.
- Overall:
Thank you for your review. Regarding images, I am not really sure if it is possible to move any left; to do so would mess with a lot of section headers. I thought about moving the #Secondary battery picture down a paragraph (to avoid being under a 4th-level heading) and to the left, but that would sandwich text between that and the AA gun picture, which I would consider worse. The problems with the ship pictures under #Service is that every picture corresponds with the ship on the right (sort of like starting out an article with a right-aligned image, I guess). What do you think? —Ed (Talk • Say no to drama) 02:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)