Talk:Statue of Vera Katz/GA1
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Vera Katz (sculpture)/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: CookieMonster755 (talk · contribs) 03:56, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
Overall assessment: Pass. CookieMonster755 (talk) 04:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | The prose is clear and concise. No spelling and grammar issues that I noticed. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | All Information in article is proportionally referenced. |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | All quotes are cited properly. |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Perfect! |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | All images have correct copyright statues. Glad that there are free photos being used. Perfect. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | All images have appropriate captions. |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | Article passes all six criteria for a Good article. Congratulations again Another Believer, your articles are amazing! |
CookieMonster755 (talk) 04:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.