Talk:Wrexham A.F.C. 2–1 Arsenal F.C./GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 07:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Reviewing this article. Won't look until later on. MWright96 (talk) 07:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Summary
[edit]- Jimmy Carter is linked to the US President and not the footballer
- Same with Steve Watkin
- "The forward's header was obstructed by a Wrexham player," - Who was that Wrexham player? Do we know?
- Not exactly clear which player it was on the video highlights Lemonade51 (talk) 17:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Link pitch invasion
Aftermath and legacy
[edit]- Link North Wales Police
- "The replay was played on 4 February with a solitary Hammers' goal coming from defender Colin Foster," - Hammers' is informal
References
[edit]- The YouTube links in References 17, 18, 19, 22 are dead.
Good read of an historic match. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 16:45, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks again @MWright96: have made corrections. Lemonade51 (talk) 17:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- I see the point on the Wrexham player has not been rectified but It is difficult to identify but since it's hard to do so, it doesn't need serious action. Other than that, am happy to pass this. MWright96 (talk) 18:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)