Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Numbermaniac (talk · contribs) 02:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- GA1: Correct spelling and grammar throughout the article.
- GA2: A long list of good references.
- GA3: No unnecessary detail, good coverage in its aspects.
- GA4: Not so much applicable here, but still no bias throughout.
- GA5: Currently no content dispute or edit war in the article's history.
- GA6: Images correctly presented in the article, all relevant to the article's topic.
With a few more checks, this article could definitely be GA-status! Yay! :P. Numbermaniac - T- C 03:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- How can I help? Images? Synergee (talk) 06:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)