Ternary relation
In mathematics, a ternary relation or triadic relation is a finitary relation in which the number of places in the relation is three. Ternary relations may also be referred to as 3-adic, 3-ary, 3-dimensional, or 3-place.
Just as a binary relation is formally defined as a set of pairs, i.e. a subset of the Cartesian product A × B of some sets A and B, so a ternary relation is a set of triples, forming a subset of the Cartesian product A × B × C of three sets A, B and C.
An example of a ternary relation in elementary geometry is the collinearity of points.
Examples
Binary functions
A function ƒ: A × B → C in two variables, taking values in two sets A and B, respectively, is formally a function that associates to every pair (a,b) in A × B an element ƒ(a, b) in C. Therefore, its graph consists of pairs of the form ((a, b), ƒ(a, b)). Such pairs in which the first element is itself a pair are often identified with triples. This makes the graph of ƒ a ternary relation between A, B and C, consisting of all triples (a, b, ƒ(a, b)), for all a in A and b in B.
Cyclic orders
Given any set A whose elements are arranged on a circle, one can define a ternary relation R on A, i.e. a subset of A3 = A × A × A, by stipulating that R(a, b, c) holds if and only if the elements a, b and c are pairwise different and when going from a to c in a clockwise direction one passes through b. For example, if A = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 } represents the hours on a clock face, then R(8, 12, 4) holds and R(12, 8, 4) does not hold.
Betweenness relations
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (May 2011) |
Congruence relation
The ordinary congruence of arithmetics
which holds for three integers a, b, and m if and only if m divides a − b, formally may be considered as a ternary relation. However, usually, this instead is considered as a family of binary relations between the a and the b, indexed by the modulus m. For each fixed m, indeed this binary relation has some natural properties, like being an equivalence relation; while the combined ternary relation in general is not studied as one relation.
Typing relation
A typing relation indicates that is a term of type in context , and is thus a ternary relation between contexts, terms and types.
Further reading
- Myers, Dale (1997), "An interpretive isomorphism between binary and ternary relations", in Mycielski, Jan; Rozenberg, Grzegorz; Salomaa, Arto (eds.), Structures in Logic and Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1261, Springer, pp. 84–105, doi:10.1007/3-540-63246-8_6, ISBN 3-540-63246-8
- Novák, Vítězslav (1996), "Ternary structures and partial semigroups", Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 46 (1): 111–120, hdl:10338.dmlcz/127275
- Novák, Vítězslav; Novotný, Miroslav (1989), "Transitive ternary relations and quasiorderings", Archivum Mathematicum, 25 (1–2): 5–12, hdl:10338.dmlcz/107333
- Novák, Vítězslav; Novotný, Miroslav (1992), "Binary and ternary relations", Mathematica Bohemica, 117 (3): 283–292, hdl:10338.dmlcz/126278
- Novotný, Miroslav (1991), "Ternary structures and groupoids", Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 41 (1): 90–98, hdl:10338.dmlcz/102437
- Šlapal, Josef (1993), "Relations and topologies", Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 43 (1): 141–150, hdl:10338.dmlcz/128381