Jump to content

The Week (1933)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Week was a British newspaper from 1933 until 1941, described by its founder as an "extreme left-wing news sheet".[1]

Marxist journalist Claud Cockburn launched the first British publication known as The Week as a newsletter in the spring of 1933, after he had returned from reporting on Germany. It focused on the rise of fascism. Jessica Mitford in A Fine Old Conflict attributed the journal's influence to its use of undercover sources.[2] It ceased publication in 1941.[2]

In the late 1930s, The Week was highly critical of Neville Chamberlain and his policy of appeasement.[3] Cockburn maintained in the 1960s that much of the information in The Week was leaked to him by Sir Robert Vansittart, the Permanent Under-Secretary of the Foreign Office.[3]

At the same time, Cockburn claimed that MI5 was spying on him because of The Week; but the British historian D.C. Watt considered that it was more likely that, if anyone was spying on Cockburn, it was the Special Branch of Scotland Yard, who were less experienced in this work than MI5.[3] Cockburn was an opponent of appeasement before the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. In a 1937 article in The Week, Cockburn coined the term Cliveden set to describe what he alleged to be an upper-class pro-German group that exercised influence behind the scenes. The Week was banned and ceased publication shortly after the war began.[1]

Watt alleges that the information printed in The Week included rumours, some of which suited Moscow's interests.[4] Watt used as an example the claim The Week made in February–March 1939 that German troops were concentrating in Klagenfurt for an invasion of Yugoslavia, which Watt says had no basis in reality.[4]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Saxon, Wolfgang (16 December 1981). "CLAUD COCKBURN, BRITISH WRITER AND SOCIAL CRITIC, IS DEAD AT 77". The New York Times.
  2. ^ a b Simkin, John (January 2020) [first published September 1997]. "Claud Cockburn". Spartacus Educational. Archived from the original on 17 April 2014. Article and quotes from sources.
  3. ^ a b c Watt, Donald Cameron "Rumors as Evidence" pages 276-286 from Russia War, Peace and Diplomacy edited by Ljubica & Mark Erickson, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2004 page 278.
  4. ^ a b Watt, Donald Cameron "Rumors as Evidence" pages 276-286 from Russia War, Peace and Diplomacy edited by Ljubica & Mark Erickson, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2004 page 283.