Tubal ligation: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by 199.189.61.37 (talk) to last revision by ClueBot NG (HG) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|medical_notes = |
|medical_notes = |
||
}} |
}} |
||
'''Tubal ligation''' or '''tubectomy''' (also known as having one's "tubes tied" (ligation)) is a surgical procedure for sterilization in which a woman's [[fallopian tube]]s are clamped and blocked, or severed and sealed, either method of which prevents eggs from reaching the uterus for [[fertilization]]. Tubal ligation is considered a permanent method of [[sterilization (medicine)|sterilization]] and [[birth control]]. |
'''Tubal ligation''' or '''tubectomy''' (also known as having one's "tubes tied" (ligation))will make you grow 5 heads and is a surgical procedure for sterilization in which a woman's [[fallopian tube]]s are clamped and blocked, or severed and sealed, either method of which prevents eggs from reaching the uterus for [[fertilization]]. Tubal ligation is considered a permanent method of [[sterilization (medicine)|sterilization]] and [[birth control]]. |
||
==Procedure== |
==Procedure== |
||
Revision as of 10:20, 30 June 2013
| Tubal ligation / Tubectomy | |
|---|---|
| Background | |
| Type | Sterilization |
| First use | 1930 |
| Failure rates (first year) | |
| Perfect use | 0.5% |
| Typical use | 0.5% |
| Usage | |
| Duration effect | Permanent |
| Reversibility | Sometimes |
| User reminders | None |
| Clinic review | None |
| Advantages and disadvantages | |
| STI protection | No |
| Risks | Operative and postoperative complications. |
Tubal ligation or tubectomy (also known as having one's "tubes tied" (ligation))will make you grow 5 heads and is a surgical procedure for sterilization in which a woman's fallopian tubes are clamped and blocked, or severed and sealed, either method of which prevents eggs from reaching the uterus for fertilization. Tubal ligation is considered a permanent method of sterilization and birth control.
Procedure
Tubal ligation is considered major surgery requiring the patient to undergo general anesthesia. It is advised that women should not undergo this surgery if they currently have or have had a history of bladder cancer. After the anesthesia takes effect, a surgeon will make a small incision at each side of, but just below the navel in order to gain access to each of the 2 fallopian tubes. With traditional tubal ligation, the surgeon severs the tubes, and then ties (ligates) them off thereby preventing the travel of eggs to the uterus. Other methods include using clips or rings to clamp them shut, or severing and cauterizing them. Tubal ligation is usually done in a hospital operating-room setting. The corresponding male surgical sterilization procedure known as Vasectomy is considered minor surgery done with local anesthesia and typically done in an out-patient setting.
Effectiveness
A tubal ligation is approximately 99% effective in the first year following the procedure. In the following years the effectiveness may be reduced slightly since the fallopian tubes can, in some cases, reform or reconnect which can cause unwanted pregnancy. Method failure is difficult to detect, except by subsequent pregnancy, unlike with vasectomy or IUD.
Of those failures, 15-20% are likely to be ectopic.[1] 84% of those failures occurred a year or more after sterilization. According to one study, approximately 5% of women who have had tubal ligation will have a failure due to ectopic pregnancy. Time seems to be a factor as the risk of failure increases after 1 or more years post-surgery. The risk of ectopic pregnancy is 12.5% for women who have had tubal ligation, which is a greater risk than for those who have not had the surgery. Recanalization or formation of tuboperitoneal fistulas occur, the openings of which are large enough for passage of sperm but too small to allow an ovum to push through, resulting in fertilization/implantation in the distal tubal segment.
Two economic studies suggest that laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation could be less cost-effective than the Essure procedure, which uses a special type of fiber to induce a benign fibrotic reaction.[2]
Tubal ligation Methods
Bipolar Coagulation The most popular method of laparoscopic female sterilization, this method uses electrical current to cauterize sections of the fallopian tube.
Monopolar Coagulation Less common than Bipolar Coagulation, Monopolar Coagulation uses electrical current to cauterize the tube together, but also allows radiating current to further damage the tubes as it spreads from the coagulation site. Many cases involve a cutting of the tubes after the procedure. [3]
Fimbriectomy By removing a portion of the fallopian tube closest to the ovary, fimbriectomy eliminates the ovary’s ability to capture eggs and transfer them to the uterus. [4]
Irving Procedure This procedure calls for placing two ligatures (sutures) around the fallopian tube and removing the segment of tubing between the ligatures. Then to complete the procedure, the ends of the fallopian tubes are connected to the back of the uterus and the connective tissue respectively. [5]
Tubal Clip The tubal clip or Hulka Clip technique involves the application of a permanent clip onto the fallopian tube. Once applied and fastened, the clip disallows transference of eggs to the ovary. [6]
Tubal Ring The silastic band or tubal ring method involves a doubling over of the fallopian tubes and application of a silastic band to the tube. [7]
Pomeroy Tubal Ligation In this method of tubal ligation, a loop of tube is “strangled” with a suture. Usually, the loop is cut and the ends cauterized or “burned“. This type of tubal ligation is often referred to as cut, tied, and burned. [8]
Essure Tubal Ligation In this method of tubal ligation, two small metal and fiber coils are placed in the fallopian tubes. After insertion, scar tissue forms around the coils, blocking off the fallopian tubes and preventing sperm from reaching the egg. [9]
Adiana Tubal Ligation In this method of tubal ligation, two small silicone pieces that were placed in the fallopian tubes. During the procedure, the health care provider heated a small portion of each fallopian tube and then inserted a tiny piece of silicone into each tube. After the procedure, scar tissue formed around the silicone inserts, blocking off the fallopian tubes and preventing sperm from reaching the egg. The procedure can no longer be performed due to a lawsuit and judgment brought by the company responsible for Essure.[10]
Reversal
Tubal ligation procedures are done to be permanent and are not considered a temporary form of birth control. Tubal reversal is microsurgery to repair the fallopian tube after a tubal ligation procedure.
Usually there are two remaining fallopian tube segments—the proximal tubal segment that emerges from the uterus and the distal tubal segment that ends with the fimbria next to the ovary. The procedure that connects these separated parts of the fallopian tube is called tubal reversal or microsurgical tubotubal anastomosis.
In a small percentage of cases, a tubal ligation procedure leaves only the distal portion of the fallopian tube and no proximal tubal opening into the uterus. This may occur when monopolar tubal coagulation has been applied to the isthmic segment of the fallopian tube as it emerges from the uterus. In this situation, a new opening can be created through the uterine muscle and the remaining tubal segment inserted into the uterine cavity. This microsurgical procedure is called tubal implantation, tubouterine implantation, or uterotubal implantation.
In vitro fertilization may overcome fertility problems in patients not suited to a tubal reversal.
Side effects
A 1998 review of over 200 articles in the English literature showed that evidence of a post-tubal sterilization syndrome (abnormal bleeding and/or pain, changes in sexual behavior and emotional health, increased premenstrual distress) was inconclusive for women over 30 years of age. The risk for women 20–29 years of age with pre-existing histories of menstrual dysfunction may be increased, "although they do not appear to undergo significant hormonal changes".[11] A 1993 study done in Japan found the symptoms of post-tubal ligation syndrome to be mild, and simple symptomatic treatment to be sufficient in most cases.[12] Discontinuing hormonal birth control has its own side effects, many of which are also commonly attributed to post-tubal sterilization syndrome. [13][14]
Prevalence
Worldwide, female sterilization is used by 33% of married women using contraception,[15] making it the most common contraceptive method.[16] As of June 2010, there is a recent decline of tubal ligation procedures in the United States after two decades of stable rates, possibly explained by an improved access to a wide range of highly effective reversible contraceptives.[17]
Advantages and disadvantages
 | This article contains a pro and con list. (November 2012) |
Tubal ligation is an abdominal surgery. One study found that postoperative complications from tubal ligation are more likely than with vasectomy and more costly.[18] In industrialized nations, mortality is 4 per 100,000 tubal ligations, versus 0.1 per 100,000 vasectomies.[19]
Tubal ligation has a larger initial cost than other contraceptive methods. It may take more than a decade of use for tubal ligation to become as cost-effective as other highly effective, long term methods like IUD or implant. Continued method costs or costs from unintended pregnancies make many other methods as or more costly than tubal ligation if used for several years.[18] The cost of tubal ligation is reduced if it is performed during a cesarean section, since the tubes are already exposed during the laparotomy.
Tubal ligation may reduce the risk of ovarian cancer, with some studies estimating the relative risk at 0.66 for epithelial types, 0.40 for endometrioid types and 0.73 for serous types.[20]
Tourism
Medical tourism is likely to be used for expensive and more complicated surgeries; however tubal ligation is on the list of available procedures.[clarification needed] Women opting for tubal ligation would likely combine their convalesce in/with a vacation-type setting. There are a large number of overseas hospitals whose websites list tubal ligation as one of their qualified surgical procedures. Medical tourism is gaining popularity (especially with higher-cost surgeries) as the overall cost of care in developing countries can provide a combination of high-tech medical care at a cost that allows for more enjoyable recovery in a vacation-type setting. Medical tourism is somewhat controversial, and has come under the scrutiny of some governments the concerns of which include quality of care, follow-up and post-operative care.[21]
References
- ^ Shah JP, Parulekar SV, Hinduja IN (1991). "Ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization". J Postgrad Med. 37 (1): 17–20. PMID 1941685.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.080, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with
|doi=10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.080instead. - ^ "Sterilization by Electrocoagulation and Division via Laparoscopy". Atlasofpelvicsurgery.com. Retrieved 2013-06-25.
- ^ "Atlas of Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery - Mickey M. Karram, Michael S. Baggish - Google Books". Books.google.com. 2011-08-18. Retrieved 2013-06-25.
- ^ "Sterilization by the Modified Irving Technique". Atlasofpelvicsurgery.com. Retrieved 2013-06-25.
- ^ "Hulka Clip Sterilization via Laparoscopy". Atlasofpelvicsurgery.com. Retrieved 2013-06-25.
- ^ "Silastic Band Sterilization via Laparoscopy". Atlasofpelvicsurgery.com. Retrieved 2013-06-25.
- ^ "Sterilization by the Pomeroy Operation". Atlasofpelvicsurgery.com. Retrieved 2013-06-25.
- ^ "Essure™ System - P020014". Fda.gov. Retrieved 2013-06-25.
- ^ "Conceptus(R) Announces Settlement of Patent Infringement Lawsuit With Hologic Nasdaq:CPTS". Globenewswire.com. Retrieved 2013-06-25.
- ^ Gentile GP, Kaufman SC, Helbig DW (1998). "Is there any evidence for a post-tubal sterilization syndrome?". Fertility and Sterility. 69 (2): 179–186. PMID 9496325.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Satoh K, Osada H (1993). "[Post-tubal ligation syndrome] [Article in Japanese]". Ryōikibetsu shōkōgun shirīzu (1): 772–3. PMID 7757737.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) - ^ "Birth control pill FAQ: Benefits, risks and choices". MayoClinic.com. 2013-05-21. Retrieved 2013-06-25.
- ^ "Questions about going off of birth control pills | Go Ask Alice!". Goaskalice.columbia.edu. Retrieved 2013-06-25.
- ^ "Family Planning Worldwide: 2008 Data Sheet" (PDF). Population Reference Bureau. 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-27.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) Data from surveys 1997-2007. - ^ World Health Organization (2002). "The intrauterine device (IUD)-worth singing about". Progress in Reproductive Health Research (60): 1–8.
- ^ Chan LM, Westhoff CL (2010). "Tubal sterilization trends in the United States". Fertil. Steril. 94 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.029. PMID 20497790.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - ^ a b James Trusell; et al. (1995). "Economic value of contraception" (PDF). American Journal of Public Health. 85 (4): 494–503. doi:10.2105/AJPH.85.4.494. PMC 1615115. PMID 7702112.
{{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in:|author=(help); Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - ^ Ninaad S. Awsare, Jai Krishnan, Greg B. Boustead, Damian C. Hanbury, and Thomas A. McNicholas (2005). "Complications of vasectomy". Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 87 (6): 406–410. doi:10.1308/003588405X71054. PMC 1964127. PMID 16263006.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1093/humupd/dmq030, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with
|doi=10.1093/humupd/dmq030instead. - ^ Lunt, Neil; Carrera, Percivil (2010). "Medical tourism: Assessing the evidence on treatment abroad". Maturitas. 66 (1): 27–32. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.01.017. PMID 20185254.
External links
