User talk:Ldm1954

Your GA nomination of Fiveling

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fiveling you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FuzzyMagma -- FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft: Clemens Burda

Hi there! Thank you for your constructive criticism of my submission. As you instructed, I have added relevant citations and removed all the peacocks. In addition to that, I also added a major award instead of the junior awards you mentioned.

Please, let me know. Sigma Spurion (talk) 23:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

It is definitely much better. It would help if you can find sources beyond Case Western for him, as some will consider his university a (weak) primary source. Also, while AAAS is a useful award, I am not so convinced that it is that notable.

I won't review the new draft, I will leave that to someone else. Ldm1954 (talk) 00:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Request on 03:43:45, 11 May 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Eppursimuove1492

• Eppursimuove1492 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Atoms All the Way Down (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for the review! Aside from referencing my own peer-reviewed journal article (which I flagged for COI), the draft also references an in-depth article published about the subject by Popular Mechanics, which is a nationally-renowned, independent and credible source. Here is a link to their article (since it may be behind a paywall): https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/fij6yxx7hexr9twlmyx8q/What-If-the-Big-Bang-Never-Happened_-A-Controversial-Theory-Explained.pdf?rlkey=ry2es2n70nak87pnx254rteoh&dl=0

Does the draft still need more? Thanks in advance

Eppursimuove1492 (talk) 03:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for established information which has been discussed/cited by multiple sources. It is not a site for describing new ideas, there must be significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) by multiple sources, not just one, and topics must have been notable with sustained coverage (WP:SUSTAINED). To date these do not exist for this topic and until they do it should not be in Wikipedia, sorry. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fiveling

The article Fiveling you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fiveling for comments about the article, and Talk:Fiveling/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FuzzyMagma -- FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Reference on Timeline of crystallography

What is the work being referenced as "Hirsch et al" on the Hans Boersch line from this revision (linked here) of the article Timeline of crystallography? I saw the reference error appear in the weekly listing. Reconrabbit 18:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Re removal of {{notability}} on Data-driven astronomy

Forgive me if I'm a bit blunt professor, but the issues you raised on my talk are grounds for a {{tone}} tag, or a more specific tag for the same issue like {{essay-like}} or {{research paper}}, and if there's a specific proposal document that it were identical to, {{close paraphrasing}} or {{copyvio}}. They are not an issue that concerns Wikipedia:Notability, which is not something that deals with the current state of the article (WP:NEXIST). That there are courses on the subject is a strong (albeit not perfect) indication there is sufficient published material to develop such a course. The fact that such material has not been properly included is immaterial for the issue of {{notability}}. The actual article being written on a specific project on that topic wouldn't make the topic non-notable any more than if we replaced the contents of another article with the contents of a random paper on the topic, say redshift survey and Berti, Maria; Spinelli, Marta; Viel, Matteo (2024-03-23). "21 cm intensity mapping cross-correlation with galaxy surveys: Current and forecasted cosmological parameters estimation for the SKAO". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 529 (4): 4803–4817. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae755. ISSN 0035-8711., as an example. The notability tag is not appropriate, because it does not identify the actual issue, which is that of article content. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)