User talk:FisherQueen

FisherQueen User Page · Talk page · Archives · Sandbox · Patrol · Templates

Did I delete your article? Try here first! good times, as usual It's always amusing when a blocked vandal starts negotiating the terms of their unblock request. Not to mention the diff they gave was for reverting their changes. Riiight. tedder (talk) 23:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC) Ah, vandals. They're actually not even 10% as amusing as they think they are. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC) I don't think they realize how little effort is expended on 'our' side versus on 'theirs', minus conversations like this, which is really about keeping ourselves entertained. tedder (talk) 23:06, 2 November 2009 (UTC) Yes. "Bwa ha ha! You cannot stop me! I will keep vandalizing 4EVA!" Okay, then, have fun with that. I'll bet you'll get bored before we do... -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:07, 2 November 2009 (UTC) Intrapreneurship FisherQueen You deleted my edit in the history section under intrapreneurship. I do not understand why you accused me of "changing my name" or creating another account. I have but one and I am a different person that the person I was writing about. True I do know that person, however, the update was still accurate. I have never self-promoted. Please undelete the reference and kindly refrain from false assumptions. Since my brand is my name, doing so may irreparably harm me and I do take that very seriously.Stephenlibman (talk) 00:21, 3 November 2009 (UTC)stephenlibman Yes, you'll recall that I was open to the possibility that you were either the same user as User:Intrapreneurshipdr or a friend of his who was editing because he'd asked him to. I am a homo, it not my fault, but i enjoy it. He isn't allowed to use Wikipedia to promote himself, even if he does so by asking someone else to do the actual typing. If you are interested in editing Wikipedia for yourself, though, rather than on your friend's behalf, you're entirely welcome here. The question is not whether the fact that Edward Haller wrote a masters' thesis on the subject is true- it's whether it's important. I myself wrote a master's thesis on The Faerie Queene, but that doesn't mean that adding my name to the article on that subject would be helpful to the encyclopedia. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009 Article contest: Durova wins 2009 WikiCup Conference report: WikiSym features research on Wikipedia Election report: 2009 ArbCom elections report Audit Subcommittee: Inaugural Audit Subcommittee elections underway Dispatches: Wikipedia remembers the Wall News and notes: Strategic planning, November conference, brief news and milestones Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations WikiProject report: Project banner meta-templates Features and admins: Approved this week Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:26, 3 November 2009 (UTC) Re:Investigation Hello, FisherQueen. You have new messages at Alphabet 21's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. How odd. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:40, 4 November 2009 (UTC) User:FrancisLightHouse FisherQueen you need to unblock this IP they did nothing wrong. You know it, and you were so rude to them and I quote <Start Qoute>Since you can't understand why you are blocked, and won't believe that you really are blocked<End Quote>To me it sound like you are just playing with them and when you are done you block the talk page. You owe them a sorry letter and also you unblock the IP http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:74.99.83.3 . I'm going to explain this to you just once more. We are not playing with you, this is not a game. You really are blocked. Stop changing ips to avoid your block. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:26, 4 November 2009 (UTC) Pointless abuse I understand, Hitler. You and your chronies have successfully raped the formerly free encyclopedia into your own ideal image. Maybe I was adding to my stub before it was marked for speedy delete within seconds of posting. Fucking WikiNazi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cancermustdie (talk • contribs) What's funny about this is that she never even bothered to write the deleted article- it wasn't deleted for lack of notability, but for absence of content. She's made three different personal attacks but no attempt to actually write an article. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC) I applaud you Thank you for blocking Cancermustdie: I was getting sick of their attacks —Preceding unsigned comment added by DylanIloveYou (talk • contribs) 02:29, 5 November 2009 (UTC) She had ample warning, and at no time did anyone even use the cheerful sarcasm that is sometimes directed at unhelpful editors; she saw only polite explanations, and responded with hateful attacks. Heaven knows what she'd do if she were in a really tense editing conflict, when she can't even deal with the idea that, in order to have an article published at Wikipedia, you do have to actually write an article. I just gave her a short block, though; if she wants to come back with better manners, she can.-FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC) Thanks for helping with that. The personal attacks went beyond the user talk pages. It started with the deleted article talk page where they first reacted to the deletion. Sorry that they think you deleted the article and got some abuse for it. Unfortunately, it doesn't surprise me that the attacks continued. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:13, 5 November 2009 (UTC) Block messages Please try to maintain a professional tone when blocking editors. I understand that User:Cancermustdie was not editing productively and was engaging in personal attacks, and I have declined the request for unblocking. However, it's not difficult to understand why Cancermustdie was upset by the blocking message. When we respond to attacks with sarcasm (especially when we are using our buttons to limit their editing options), it does not have the effect of defusing the situation. A neutral block message is much more likely to convince the blocked editor to improve his behavior once the block ends. Dekimasuよ! 03:00, 5 November 2009 (UTC) I confess that I do have a template which I use on very rare occasions, on users who are behaving so outrageously badly that it seems unlikely that they will improve their behavior, who have failed to respond to politeness, and who have been blocked after making choices that they understood would lead to those blocks. It's a template I use rarely, and I've been often complimented on it by other editors and admins. However, I acknowledge that it is not helpful in situations which might be defused by politeness or reasonable discussion. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 03:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC) Protection of User talk:Tarman10 I think the Talk Page of User:Tarman10 needs to be protected to prevent Tarman10 from editing.--Lamborghini man (talk) 13:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC) There's no need to protect the page right now, since he hasn't made excessive unblock requests or particularly disruptive edits. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC) A twice-banned user is assuming two new identities FisherQueen, I need your help. There is a person who is vandalizing Wikipedia and trying to evade his block via sock puppets. I believe you are familiar with him. His original name was azayas4reel and he has since used the sock puppet HarabianNights (which has also been banned) and now HarabianNights1. I believe he has created another sock puppet based on my handle. He is now going by Tainotalisman2 and he is trying to prevent a deletion of an article on Anthony Zayas. I am not Tainotalisman2 nor want to be confused for him. Please advise. Thanks, Tainotalisman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tainotalisman (talk • contribs) 20:24, 5 November 2009 (UTC) No worries; I already blocked User:Tainotalisman2. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)