User talk:ToxicWasteGrounds: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 359507500 by Banging pots and pans (talk) vandalism |
→Pots and pans!: new section |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::: I've now had another look. What I found was that the article is not a hoax, so that wouldn't have been an appropriate tagging. The 'constant recreations' was ''one'' recreation. The 'vandalism' was almost certainly a good faith attempt at editing. Although misguided from a [[WP:COI]] point of view, it is not vandalism. It would be disruptive editing if it continued, but please [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] and remember not to [[WP:BITE]]. Thanks, [[User:Peter/s|Peter]] 20:25, 30 April 2010 (UTC) |
::: I've now had another look. What I found was that the article is not a hoax, so that wouldn't have been an appropriate tagging. The 'constant recreations' was ''one'' recreation. The 'vandalism' was almost certainly a good faith attempt at editing. Although misguided from a [[WP:COI]] point of view, it is not vandalism. It would be disruptive editing if it continued, but please [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] and remember not to [[WP:BITE]]. Thanks, [[User:Peter/s|Peter]] 20:25, 30 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
::::I will. Thanks for helping :) Regards, <font color="green">[[User:ToxicWasteGrounds|Toxic]]</font><font color="midnightblue">[[User talk:ToxicWasteGrounds|Waste]]</font><font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/ToxicWasteGrounds|Grounds]]</font> 20:29, 30 April 2010 (UTC) |
::::I will. Thanks for helping :) Regards, <font color="green">[[User:ToxicWasteGrounds|Toxic]]</font><font color="midnightblue">[[User talk:ToxicWasteGrounds|Waste]]</font><font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/ToxicWasteGrounds|Grounds]]</font> 20:29, 30 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Pots and pans! == |
|||
Bang bang your pots and pans. Bang bang! Pots and pans! Pots and pans!--[[User:Banging pots and pans|Banging pots and pans]] ([[User talk:Banging pots and pans|talk]]) 20:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:37, 1 May 2010
Status: Online 
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
| Please leave a . |
Your Eschmitt89 (talk · contribs) report on WP:AIV
At first glance it doesn't seem like vandalism. If the article is a hoax it should be re-tagged as such. Re-creating a non-notable article once is not vandalism, though would be disruptive editing if continues repeatedly. Can you explain? Peter 19:41, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- I had mistaken the user's contributions as vandalism due to the constant recreations. I do admit my mistake as when I first tagged the article, I was unaware that it was constantly recreated. I do apologize for this and I will re-tag (if not deleted) as a hoax. ToxicWasteGrounds 19:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll take a closer look once the WP:AIV backlog is cleared. Peter 19:48, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- I've now had another look. What I found was that the article is not a hoax, so that wouldn't have been an appropriate tagging. The 'constant recreations' was one recreation. The 'vandalism' was almost certainly a good faith attempt at editing. Although misguided from a WP:COI point of view, it is not vandalism. It would be disruptive editing if it continued, but please assume good faith and remember not to WP:BITE. Thanks, Peter 20:25, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll take a closer look once the WP:AIV backlog is cleared. Peter 19:48, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Pots and pans!
Bang bang your pots and pans. Bang bang! Pots and pans! Pots and pans!--Banging pots and pans (talk) 20:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC)