Jump to content

User talk:ToxicWasteGrounds: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 359507500 by Banging pots and pans (talk) vandalism
Pots and pans!: new section
Line 17: Line 17:
::: I've now had another look. What I found was that the article is not a hoax, so that wouldn't have been an appropriate tagging. The 'constant recreations' was ''one'' recreation. The 'vandalism' was almost certainly a good faith attempt at editing. Although misguided from a [[WP:COI]] point of view, it is not vandalism. It would be disruptive editing if it continued, but please [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] and remember not to [[WP:BITE]]. Thanks, [[User:Peter/s|Peter]] 20:25, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
::: I've now had another look. What I found was that the article is not a hoax, so that wouldn't have been an appropriate tagging. The 'constant recreations' was ''one'' recreation. The 'vandalism' was almost certainly a good faith attempt at editing. Although misguided from a [[WP:COI]] point of view, it is not vandalism. It would be disruptive editing if it continued, but please [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] and remember not to [[WP:BITE]]. Thanks, [[User:Peter/s|Peter]] 20:25, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
::::I will. Thanks for helping :) Regards, <font color="green">[[User:ToxicWasteGrounds|Toxic]]</font><font color="midnightblue">[[User talk:ToxicWasteGrounds|Waste]]</font><font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/ToxicWasteGrounds|Grounds]]</font> 20:29, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
::::I will. Thanks for helping :) Regards, <font color="green">[[User:ToxicWasteGrounds|Toxic]]</font><font color="midnightblue">[[User talk:ToxicWasteGrounds|Waste]]</font><font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/ToxicWasteGrounds|Grounds]]</font> 20:29, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

== Pots and pans! ==

Bang bang your pots and pans. Bang bang! Pots and pans! Pots and pans!--[[User:Banging pots and pans|Banging pots and pans]] ([[User talk:Banging pots and pans|talk]]) 20:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:37, 1 May 2010

Your Eschmitt89 (talk · contribs) report on WP:AIV

At first glance it doesn't seem like vandalism. If the article is a hoax it should be re-tagged as such. Re-creating a non-notable article once is not vandalism, though would be disruptive editing if continues repeatedly. Can you explain? Peter 19:41, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

I had mistaken the user's contributions as vandalism due to the constant recreations. I do admit my mistake as when I first tagged the article, I was unaware that it was constantly recreated. I do apologize for this and I will re-tag (if not deleted) as a hoax. ToxicWasteGrounds 19:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'll take a closer look once the WP:AIV backlog is cleared. Peter 19:48, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
I've now had another look. What I found was that the article is not a hoax, so that wouldn't have been an appropriate tagging. The 'constant recreations' was one recreation. The 'vandalism' was almost certainly a good faith attempt at editing. Although misguided from a WP:COI point of view, it is not vandalism. It would be disruptive editing if it continued, but please assume good faith and remember not to WP:BITE. Thanks, Peter 20:25, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
I will. Thanks for helping :) Regards, ToxicWasteGrounds 20:29, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pots and pans!

Bang bang your pots and pans. Bang bang! Pots and pans! Pots and pans!--Banging pots and pans (talk) 20:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]