User talk:Waggers: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
←Replaced content with 'Waggers sucks Hugh Jackman's tiny cock.' |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Waggers sucks Hugh Jackman's tiny cock. |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
|archiveheader = {{User:Waggers/tp/combined}} |
|||
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|||
|counter = 11 |
|||
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|||
|algo = old(7d) |
|||
|archive = User talk:Waggers/Archive %(counter)02d |
|||
}}{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |target=User talk:Waggers/Archive index |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=no |mask=User talk:Waggers/Archive <#>}} |
|||
{| class="Talk-Notice" |
|||
|- |
|||
|align="center"|[[Image:Nuvola apps kopete.png|50px|Comment]] |
|||
|| |
|||
'''Welcome to my discussion page. -- [[User:Waggers|Waggers]]'''. <br> |
|||
'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Waggers&action=edit§ion=new Click here to leave me a new message]''' |
|||
*Please note that [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]] or inflammatory messages will be removed. |
|||
*Please try to keep discussions on topic. |
|||
*Please sign your comments with four tildes (like this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) |
|||
*If you're replying to an existing message, please indent your message using colons. (If your message is over several paragraphs, please indent '''and sign''' them all. That way other users [including me] can respond to your individual points) |
|||
{{Usertalkback}} |
|||
By the way, you can [[Special:Emailuser/Waggers|email me]] if you want but I check this talk page more frequently than that email account. |
|||
|} |
|||
{{User:Waggers/tp/ta}} |
|||
== thanks for help == |
|||
thanks for your considerable and vital help. i've been looking for someone neutral, even-handed fair and sensible to be able to collaborate and/or discuss with over there. i have no idea why people over there seem to allow the tone which they do. I was really waiting for someone to come along and make the process what it should be, ie more professional and even-toned, so I could simply bow out gracefully, since i really didn't have any objection to any discussion process in the first place. thanks for coming along. people like you make wikipedia go around! :-) (I;ll send you a wiki smile if i can find the right template! :-) :-) thanks. --[[User:Sm8900|Steve, Sm8900]] ([[User talk:Sm8900|talk]]) 18:06, 13 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== can you explain to me why you deleted my page? == |
|||
i wrote an explanation on the talk page but got no reply. u just deleted it, it was livedatelove.com <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Alexpr07|Alexpr07]] ([[User talk:Alexpr07|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alexpr07|contribs]]) 10:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
can you please talk to me here or on my talk page. you were fast to delete my page but did not respond to my explanations. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Alexpr07|Alexpr07]] ([[User talk:Alexpr07|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alexpr07|contribs]]) 10:09, 14 November 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Your post on the talk page ''did'' get a response - here it is verbatum: |
|||
::::There are lot of dating site pages on Wike, why is this one deleted? how is it different? for example, match.com or plentyoffish? also, i wanted to give a link to this page on the list of dating sites page... it said that the list was incomplete so i wanted to add it. |
|||
:::::Look at [[WP:WEB]] guideline on how to create new article about a website. Other articles may be subjected to deletion if they don't satisfy wikipedia policy. Dekisugi (talk) 09:58, 14 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Please also see [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]]. [[User:Waggers|waggers]] ([[User talk:Waggers#top|talk]]) 10:12, 14 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== thank you == |
|||
I read the quidelines but still confused by what was missing. Can you help me? |
|||
This is from the guidelines: "an editor unfamiliar with guidelines may vote to keep an article solely because articles similar to it exist." |
|||
When I created my article I looked at the similar articles for example so I don't really understand what's wrong with it. Please explain. |
|||
Also, there's an article called "list of online dating sites" and I tried to add another site there but it's removed. Why? I didn't even put a link to it or anything, just wrote LiveDateLove as name.... It's relevant content, how come I can't add it? It does say in the article that list incomplete and asks for help expanding it... [[User:Alexpr07|Alexpr07]] ([[User talk:Alexpr07|talk]]) 10:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
: Wikipedia articles need to meet our criteria for inclusion, which includes [[WP:N|notability]]. To be included, the website needs to have received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, and you need to demonstrate that in the article itself. Wikipedia is not a web directory - we don't want to have an article on every dating site that exists. [[User:Waggers|waggers]] ([[User talk:Waggers#top|talk]]) 10:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
<br /> |
|||
what about my second question when i tried to edit an article? If you don't want to have an article for each dating site it's fine, but why can't I add a site to a dating site list? or only sites that have articles can be added? also look at [[Yahoo Personals]] article, it's really amazing<br /> |
|||
And notability issue is not the reason for speed deletion. look at other similar articles like "erotas online" or "chemistry.com" and etc.... just because a site is not in the news it's not notable? [[User:Alexpr07|Alexpr07]] ([[User talk:Alexpr07|talk]]) 10:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Notability / failure to meet the inclusion criteria was '''exactly''' the reason for the speedy deletion - see the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=LiveDateLove.com deletion log] for proof. The tag that was put on the article was {{t1|db-web}} - "an article about a web site, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content that does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject." When I reviewed the article, I found that to be the case and acted accordingly. If you believe there are other articles that should be deleted for the same reasons, feel free to nominate them for deletion - there are three ways of doing this, and you can read more at [[WP:DELETE]]. I recommend you familiarise yourself with the deletion policy and guidelines before proceding though. |
|||
:Regarding the list, your post at [[Talk:List of online dating websites]] now has a reply. [[User:Waggers|waggers]] ([[User talk:Waggers#top|talk]]) 11:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Progress on the Manual of Style? == |
|||
Please see [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(Ireland-related_articles)/Ireland_disambiguation_task_force#Task_Force_terms_of_reference]] and in particular the subsection Compromise Proposal. -- [[User:Evertype|Evertype]]·[[User_talk:Evertype|✆]] 21:00, 18 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Forum shopping? == |
|||
Hi Waggers, I was a little disappointed to see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=252659776&oldid=252659504 this remark]. Another editor reported Freddyboytoy to AN [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=252638007&oldid=252637537]; I, having also seen Freddy's actions, observed in that thread that AIV might be the better place [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=252641091]. The vandalism continued, so, since the other editor had not done so, I started an AIV report. Forum shopping? I don't think so. Please try to assume just a little good faith when dealing with experienced editors, rather than assuming the worst. Many thanks, [[User:AlasdairGreen27|AlasdairGreen27]] ([[User talk:AlasdairGreen27|talk]]) 22:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Reporting the same thing in two different places, hoping to get a different (or faster) result, is pretty much the ''definition'' of forum shopping in my book, experienced editors or otherwise. [[User:Waggers|waggers]] ([[User talk:Waggers#top|talk]]) 08:16, 19 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::Well, you are entitled to your opinion. Sadly, you are mistaken. I reported the matter to AIV ''not'' because I was hoping to get a different (or faster) result but because I believed it to be the correct venue for it. You have absolutely no grounds to try to guess what somebody else may or may not be hoping, and, as a general point, as I have said, you would do well to assume that fellow editors are doing what they believe to be the right thing unless you have firm evidence to the contrary. [[User:AlasdairGreen27|AlasdairGreen27]] ([[User talk:AlasdairGreen27|talk]]) 10:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::"you would do well to assume that fellow editors are doing what they believe to be the right thing" - where have I indicated anything to the contrary? I haven't suggested for a moment that ''you'' thought your actions were incorrect. But posting the same problem to multiple admin noticeboards just wastes administrators' time. ''If'' the thread at WP:AN shouldn't have been there, it should have been closed or removed before making the report at AIV. [[User:Waggers|waggers]] ([[User talk:Waggers#top|talk]]) 10:54, 19 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Thanks! == |
|||
Wow. I need to find the CVU award. When a person can undo vandilisim on your own page faster then you it means something! Thanks! You need a hug. (>'_')>[[User:Irunongames|Irunongames]] ([[User talk:Irunongames|talk]]) 21:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:27, 20 November 2008
Waggers sucks Hugh Jackman's tiny cock.