User talk:ChrisB: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:35, 31 January 2008

Me

I'm the BIGGEST, FATTEST DOUCHE IN THE UNIVERSE!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by TJ Terry (talk • contribs) 06:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Archives: [[User_talk:ChrisB/Archive3|2007]] | [[User_talk:ChrisB/Archive2|2006]] | [[User_talk:ChrisB/Archive1|2004-2005]] | [[User_talk:ChrisB/BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]]
 ==Me==
 I'm the BIGGEST, FATTEST DOUCHE IN THE UNIVERSE!!!  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:TJ Terry|TJ Terry]] ([[User talk:TJ Terry|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TJ Terry|contribs]]) 06:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-==WikiProject Alternative music December 2007 Newsletter==
-{{Wikipedia:WikiProject_Alternative_music/Newsletter/December 2007}} <br><small>You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music|WikiProject Alternative music]]. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Alternative_music/Newsletter#Delivery options|here]]. This newsletter was delivered by the automated [[User:Xihix|<span style="border:2px solid black;padding:2px; color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">'''xihix'''</span>]]<font size="1">([[User_talk:Xihix|talk]])</font> 04:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC) </small>.
-==[[:List of early emo groups]]==
-[[Image:Nuvola apps important yellow.svg|left|48px|]]
-Another editor has added the "{{tl|prod}}" template to the article [[List of early emo groups]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]] and [[Wikipedia:Notability]]). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at [[Talk:List of early emo groups|its talk page]]. If you remove the {{tl|prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. <!-- Template:PRODNote --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 13:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
-== WNNX/WWWQ ==
-Hey, I have a few questions for you. You do realize that the call letters WWWQ are following Q100 over to 99.7fm, the WNNX call letter will be replaced by the new call letters of the new station that's premiering on 100.5fm right? [[User:Rwils|Rwils]] ([[User talk:Rwils|talk]]) 17:26, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
-Truce.  I disagree with you, you disagree with me.  Neither of us is getting anywhere by going at each other's edits.  I have a lot of information that isn't necessarily "public" yet and was editing based on that, but apparently that's not good enough.  Fine.  It's unfortunate that happens to be Wiki policy, but I understand the necessity for it.--[[User:InDeBiz1|InDeBiz1]] ([[User talk:InDeBiz1|talk]]) 07:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
-:Thanks for the heads-up on the article. The other poster keeps trying to say that because he's "in the biz" that he should get special treatment. <shrug> I'm a television producer in Atlanta with my own share of "inside knowledge" too, but hey. I guess he feels he knows better. I always thought WP policy trumped everything else... --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] ([[User talk:Mhking|talk]]) 23:44, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
-----
-You've made lots of good edits trying to sort out the WNNX / WWWQ / 99X pages with the current situation down there.  I do expect a lot more changes to come in the next week or so.  I still stand by thinking that the terrestial WNNX items should stay on that page as opposed to moving to the 99X page... albeit that would make the WNNX page mega-long. However, this would be consistent with what would have happened if 99X did not go online only.  The history of the frequency (and Sean's take on it) should stay on the WNNX history page; keeping two different copies may result in edits to one and not the other.  So, to sum up my opinion (which you can do with what you may):  it's trying to separate articles about on-air content vs articles about the frequency itself.  If the article stayed "99X" all along, then it wouldn't be an issue with merging stuff together as all the 99X stuff could stay on one page, but because someone decided to call 99X as "WNNX", then that's where all the merge madness happens.  The 99X today is something completely new from what it was a week ago on WNNX, hence my transition plan suggestion of making it a new article (with links to WNNX) as opposed to trying to force both pages to contain the same info.  (ex:  Jimmy Baron is not a former 99X staffer, he's a former WNNX staffer... as 99X in its current state never existed before).  Anyways, there's my 4 cents. [[User:RadioBoy2003|RadioBoy2003]] ([[User talk:RadioBoy2003|talk]]) 13:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
-----
-You do realize now that the new call letters for Rock 100.5 are WNNX right? You need to switch the WNNX call letters over to Rock 100.5 and WWWQ over to Q100. The FCC has made the switch. If you don't believe me just listen to the Station ID at the top of the hour. [[User:Rwils|Rwils]] ([[User talk:Rwils|talk]]) Tuesday, 2008-01-29 21:39 UTC, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
-== WWWQ Edits ==
-Hey, how come you don't like my bit about the WWWQ stunting and format change? What's up with that? I tried to be as accurate as possible.
-[[User:Matsuto77|Matsuto77]] ([[User talk:Matsuto77|talk]]) 22:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Matsuto77
-== RE: WWWQ Edits ==
-Ah, okay, I suppose you're right. But perhaps a brief mention of it in the WWWQ article would work?  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/132.205.161.58|132.205.161.58]] ([[User talk:132.205.161.58|talk]]) 16:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-==Fair use rationale for [[:Image:Nirvana-FromTheMuddyBanksOfTheWishkah.jpg]]==
-Thanks for uploading or contributing to '''[[:Image:Nirvana-FromTheMuddyBanksOfTheWishkah.jpg]]'''. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under [[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]] but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to [[:Image:Nirvana-FromTheMuddyBanksOfTheWishkah.jpg|the image description page]] and edit it to include a [[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline|fair use rationale]].
-If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> — [[User:Save Us 229|<font color="007FFF">Save_Us</font>]] [[User talk:Save Us 229|<font color="000000">†</font>]] 01:21, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
-== Cobain Death ==
-It is ALREADY an issue on the discussion page, to which I responded that I'd re-add the content but wait for citations regarding the rest - ''before'' I re-added the content. Two people wanted it in, two people said something, you said nothing. I'd very much like to keep it in the discussion section but you should have - and could have - responded. Not waited until it was put in and then talk about how ridiculous edit wars are after editing it and still not responding. [[User:NeoApsara|NeoApsara]] ([[User talk:NeoApsara|talk]]) 18:26, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
-==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sg96promo.jpg==
-Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Sg96promo.jpg]]'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline]] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
-If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 05:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
-== 99X ==
-This message is regarding your edit summary to [[99X]]. Please use a phrase more specific than "revert" unless the edit you reverted was the most recent edit made to the article, which yours was not. [[User:Georgia guy|Georgia guy]] ([[User talk:Georgia guy|talk]]) 20:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
-== Updated Nirvana Sales ==
-Just read your response in the discussion section...Chris....whether something is irrelevant is up to the mind of the beholder.  Many would disagree that updated sales are mere trivia.  They indicate a bands continued popularity with new generations over time.  I do have cited sources stating that Nirvana have sold over 60 million albums worldwide.  However, you must realize that it's sometimes impossible to get just one source stating that any band has sold a certain amount worldwide.  In Nirvana's case, one could cite published sales data from worldwide sales organizations such as the RIAA in America, CRIA in Canada, and ARIA in Australia just to name a few.  By adding up these documented sources, one can arrive at Nirvana's 60 million figure.  The Neilson Soundscan company, which measures album sales in the U.S. lists that Nirvana have sold 4.5 million in the U.S. alone since 2002.  I can revise the sentence with a verifiable source if you think it would be relevant.  Would it?  I do rememeber seeing a 2006 documented source that did list Nirvana as selling over 60 million worldwide.  Thanks for your response.  [[User:Allaplgies|allaplgies]] ([[User talk:Allaplgies|talk]]) 04:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
-== 99X Craig/Fram Dismissal ==
-Actually, these two are no longer employed by Cumulus.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.153.32.226|68.153.32.226]] ([[User talk:68.153.32.226|talk]]) 14:28, 29 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-==Call sign switch==
-I have switched the 2 pages [[WNNX]] and [[WWWQ]] as requested. I will leave you to sort out the content & links as you probably are in a better position to do this.
-[[User:Keith D|Keith D]] ([[User talk:Keith D|talk]]) 22:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
-:Re-associated missing talk page. [[User:Keith D|Keith D]] ([[User talk:Keith D|talk]]) 23:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)