User talk:Erieke456

Please add new comments at the bottom. I'll usually respond on your own talkpage.

Lecca

Why, yes, I do have clarifying comments about this. If you reread the deletion reason, you'll see that I didn't say the topic was insignificant. I said that the article "does not assert significance". These are very different things. The version I deleted did not indicate how the subject met the notability requirement, although I just looked at the deleted version and it was perhaps borderline. You are more than welcome to recreate the article, since it was not deleted by AfD, and it will not be redeleted if you elaborate why the subject is notable. This doesn't have to be anythings as blunt as "Lecca is notable because blah blah blah" - it can be a listing of hit singles, references that indicate that the subject has been the subject of multiple other works, or similar. Natalie (talk) 19:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Reading "does not assert significance" as "is insignificant" is an incredibly common occurrence. Good luck with the new article. Natalie (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Something Positive

Its nothing personal against the article if you check my editing history I hold all articles to the same standards which are the same standards that the entire community holds all articles to. I've tagged all manners of subjects for notability, references, neutrality, etc. As far as establishing notability, the link is in the box. You need to demonstrate significant coverage by reliable third party sources. This usually comes in the form of at least 2 articles about the webcomic (not the creator), or demonstrate that the comic has won a significant and notable award (like a webby) Also if the comic was syndicated nationally that would also suffice. --Crossmr (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)