User talk:Grand'mere Eugene/Archives/2022/December

Figs (company)

Hi Grand'mere Eugene. I recently posted an edit request to Talk:Figs_(company)#Lawsuit_and_Spruce_Point. I saw your name as a participant in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies/Participants, so I am hoping you will have some interest in Figs (company), which is a company based in California, with an interesting history. I would appreciate you having a look at my edit request, and implementing it if you think that is the appropriate action. Thanks for your involvement, Todd at Figs (talk) 16:57, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Todd at Figs, I made the edits you requested, but I changed the text about the lawsuit leaving out the name of the competitor. If you prefer to include it, let me know. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 20:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks so much for your quick and positive response. I am happy that you left out the name of the company, and do not want to change your edits in any way at all. I really appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Todd at Figs (talk • contribs) 18:46, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CapitolHS-logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CapitolHS-logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

This image was replaced by an updated image. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 18:14, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Just a comment

This is well said. While I still disagree you on this particular article, I always appreciate your point of view. There are a couple of editors where that is not the case, particularly one that is always talking about "upholding the rules of notability" while simultaneously denying portions of those same "rules" they do not like, lol. Thanks! — Jacona (talk) 19:03, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, Jacona, I have to admit that "lasting cultural impact" is an attractive bar for encyclopedia articles, but then what would we do with all the porn star and video game articles? — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 22:59, 22 December 2022 (UTC)