User talk:Zephyrus Tavvier

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Monsterman222)
Jump to: navigation, search

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Zephyrus Tavvier. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of UpCodes[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article UpCodes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability: What distinguishes UpCodes so that it should be in an encyclopedia?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 01:39, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

@Rhadow: thanks, I've gone ahead and explained why I believe this page meets Wikipedia's criteria in the talk page.

Nomination of UpCodes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UpCodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UpCodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:06, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

UpCodes[edit]

Hi, I am curious if you happen to have any affiliation with the company. If you could let me know, that would be great. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

@K.e.coffman: Thanks for pinging me. Yes, I do have an affiliation with the company. I know that sounds bad, but let me also point out that this isn't my first article I've created and I do truly believe it qualifies for all of the notability requirements for a new article. I wouldn't have created it if I had thought otherwise. What are your thoughts? Also, is there any way I can improve the article? Zephyrus Tavvier (talk) 03:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Hmm, wait 10 years so that the company is more notable by that time? :-) Separately, if you could add a note about your COI to the deletion discussion, I would appreciate it. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Haha! Cool, I just added a disclaimer to my comment. Zephyrus Tavvier (talk) 04:02, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. Please also see the note below about managing conflict of interest situations. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Cool, thanks for sharing that! Zephyrus Tavvier (talk) 04:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Zephyrus Tavvier. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article UpCodes, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Please see links about declaring you COI on the article's Talk page, user page, etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:06, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Zephyrus Tavvier. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)