Jump to content

User talk:Muzilon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned non-free image File:Joseph Taylor (1858-1942).jpeg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Joseph Taylor (1858-1942).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Will Scotland has been accepted

[edit]
Will Scotland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 06:36, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Hanna (author) has been accepted

[edit]
David Hanna (author), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 21:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Larnoch Rd murders

[edit]

Hi Muzilon, despite our disagreement over what to name this article, I have great respect for you as an editor. Your edits are always constructive - except perhaps for this one issue on which we disagree. My concern is that you are not following wiki policy. WP:Article says The title indicates what the article is about. Despite a lenghty discussion on the Talk page, You have not provided any evidence to show that the article is more about the deaths than about the miscarriage of justice. Just about every source cited in the article is focussed on or refers to the latter. I don't think you can disagree with that.

Also you quoted this from WP:Notability: "A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article". Leah Stephens and Fuller-Sandys are ONLY known because of their (alleged) connection to alleged crimes. They have no other claim to fame. Can you please explain why you think this article should be named after them when wiki policy specifically excludes this. Kiwimanic (talk) 20:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]