User talk:Euphoria42

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Noahk11)
Jump to: navigation, search

Thank you! Its fun contributing any way that I can. Thanks for your thanks.--The Old Pueblo (talk) 04:55, 8 December 2014 (UTC)


Hello. I have recently created a page called Addlestone Utd F.C You have patrolled and tagged it. Is that all OK? I am looking to add lots more information to it. I hope all is good with it. I can ensure you I endeavor to expand the content to the page

So far so good! I only marked it as a stub due to it being short, this categorizes it as such so others can also help add content. Thank you for creating the page, happy editing! ~Euphoria42 21:04, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello, you reverted undisputed content along with disputed content at -- (talk) 21:48, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) No, that is incorrect. You are being intentionally disruptive. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Usertalkclean userfied[edit]

FYI, per this TfD outcome, I've moved the template to User:Euphoria42/Usertalkclean and updated the transclusion on this page. Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Awesome thanks! -Euphoria42 (talk) 05:19, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted[edit]

Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Hello Euphoria42. Please note that I have reverted changes to a recent revision you accepted at UEFA Best Player in Europe Award (diff) -- please review the page history for details, and welcome to your new pending changes reviewer permissions. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 17:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello Euphoria42 Thank you for the welcome. I am an academic who specializes in gender theory and history and I noticed that the page "legal aspects of transexualism in the United States" was extremely out-of-date and incomplete and have updated it accordingly to reflect recent cases and developments in transgender law.

However, the title of the page remains a problem - as does the related page "Legal aspects of transsexualism" I notice that this was a matter of discussion in the talk section, but noone has yet changed the title.

Transsexual has not been considered an inclusive term for transgender people since the early 1990s, but only a subset of transgender people. All the major legal organizations which are driving legal changes in transgender law use the term "transgender" as an umbrella term. There is also academic consensus on "transgender" as an umbrella term. Style guidelines on trans issues used by all the media outlets also accept "transgender" as an umbrella term which includes transsexuals.

It really is time to change the headings of those two pages to either: "Transgender Law" and "Transgender Law in the United States" or "Transgender Rights" and "Transgender Rights in the United States"

Can you help do this? 2602:306:80B0:28E0:C920:F748:CDC7:7A3 (talk) 03:16, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

The request for the page to be renamed/moved is currently being discussed on the articles talk page as you mentioned. The request was just filed today though, so I would give it some time. I don't foresee there being any problems with the rename and I expect it to go through. It just needs time (a week at most, but i expect sooner). I added my opinion about the move to the discussion on the articles talk page and you can also do so here. I can go ahead and add the request for a rename to the other page as well, and you can then contribute to that discussion. Thank you for your concern and enthusiasm. Happy editing! -Euphoria42 (talk) 03:29, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks so much! You're a gem. It is an important and very current topic.

Vandalism in WikiLeaks article[edit]

Why did you vandalized (removed without explanation) my changes:

Seems that you are vandalizer!

User, read before removing changes in WikiLeaks article: — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 17:48, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

I am attempting to contact other editors to resolve this issue, please be patient -Euphoria42 (talk) 17:50, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Ok. Till then I removing changes as did Izno with my changes (without explanation and talk) and after that AndyTheGrump with explanation which I giving you now: "citing verifiable sources for all statements, making clear the nature of the organisation and the content of the leaked material"

because sourced article does not contain any verification about fact that leak actually contains real authentic TPP draft text! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 17:57, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Admin intervention has been requested, don't forget to sign your posts with four tildes. -Euphoria42 (talk) 18:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

I feel that my comment was constructive. You can't presume to speak intelligently about the inner workings of someone else's mind, so how would you know whether or not Ben Miller came up with the idea as well. Sucka. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 03:55, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

References are required on Wikipedia. Speculation on what someone may or may not have thought is not fact, and it cannot be sourced. -Euphoria42 (talk) 03:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC) @


Bruh... Your NO FUN AT ALL!!! Wikipedia is for fun and non-reliable information. What's the point of fixing it if random people can edit it?!? Good-bye! ,Jason Peter Todd Red X Jason Peter Todd RedX (talk) 04:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

@Jason Peter Todd RedX: I'd like to encourage you to read Wikipedia's policies, because you are wrong. Please refrain from continuing to vandalize Wikipedia or your editing privileges will be revoked. -Euphoria42 (talk) 04:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

ABC College Football Results Reversion[edit]

The reversion that you did is incorrect. The kickoff time for the 2014 Iowa State - TCU game was indeed 12:00 PM. For reference (talk) 04:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

@ My apologies, I ment to revert it and then edit the page so it said 12:00 PM but I suppose I got side tracked. I recognize that it was a valid edit. Thank you for making me aware, I revert alot of vandalism almost every day and sometimes I might slip up. Have a great day. -Euphoria42 (talk) 05:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]


For safekeeping my TP. :D

FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:12, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

@FreeatlastChitchat: My pleasure :) -Euphoria42 (talk) 07:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 30 August[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

False positive -Euphoria42 (talk) 20:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
It's not a false positive. Please check it again. The citation lacks a "publisher" parameter. I've fixed it, but it's WP:OR. Thanks. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't really understand how you reference that other than through Tumblr's website itself, but thank you. -Euphoria42 (talk) 01:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Well, there probably isn't any way of doing so. I'm just a stickler for Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I'm quite happy for a "better source" tag instead. At some point, someone else might find a third party source for the obvious. In all honesty, most articles wouldn't exist if we deleted everything that doesn't come with secondary sources. It's a bit close to the bone because there are no sources discussing the efficacy (or lack thereof), so I'd rather some form of 'disclaimer' were in place. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Understood, thanks for your concern and input :) -Euphoria42 (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

stop vandilisng me[edit]

bad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foxofpyromancy (talkcontribs) 14:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Can you please reference where i supposedly vandalized you? -Euphoria42 (talk) 21:11, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

@Foxofpyromancy:-Euphoria42 (talk) 16:49, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kangaroo (song)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Kangaroo (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No non-primary references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 08:45, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your concern. I'll continue to look into this. -Euphoria42 (talk) 17:11, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Content removal[edit]

I have in fact stated why I removed text from the Darśana article in the edit summary [1] and have now further elaborated in the talk page. I hope that is sufficient for you to undo your revert. Best, Canto55 (talk) 04:27, 26 January 2016 (UTC)


No im there but u joining me Butterfly1443 (talk) 08:16, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

RfC at WikiProject Amusement Parks[edit]

Super Star, Freak Out and KMG Booster, night.jpg A change to the list of available statuses for Amusement Park infoboxes is being considered at the following discussion:

Please share any thoughts or comments you might have there. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 13:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

You are receiving this notification, because you are listed as a member of WikiProject Amusement Parks

New deal for page patrollers[edit]

Hi Euphoria42,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Euphoria42. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)