User talk:RagingR2
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Synodic month extreme durations
[edit]Hi!
Back in 2014 (!), you did a major update of the page Lunar month, in which, among other things, you mention that “the actual time between lunations may range from about 29.18 to about 29.93 days.” However, you provided no source for this information.
Countless websites have copied this information from Wikipedia without questioning it.
However, the actual extreme durations for the synodic month, according to Jean Meeus, are “between about 29.27 and 29.83 days” (More Mathematical Astronomy Morsels, Willmann-Bell, 2002, p. 23).
I have updated Lunar month accordingly, but I am curious as to where you got the information from, that it’s 29.18 to 29.93 days…
Regards,
CielProfond (talk) 17:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for not providing a source back then; I have no idea 10 years later (!) where I read it, but I assume it was NASA or a similar source, since I wouldn't add something like that without knowing fairly certain that it was correct. I realize this is not a defense for not adding the source, and I don't mean it like that, I'm just saying knowing myself, even if it was 10 years back, I can't imagine I added such a thing based on a bogus source, or pulling it out my own hat. I'm trying to reverse engineer it now, which again 10 years later is pretty impossible, I guess that's my own fault. For what it's worth this is what NASA says about it: https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/moonorbit.html They do provide a list or recent lunation lenghts, but not a clear estimation for the theoretical minimum and maximum. I can't imagine by the way that NASA wouldn't have knowledge on this; but it's not on this page, and I can't find it anywhere else either right now. For now, I guess your correction and provided source is fine; if and when someone finds an even better or more recent estimation and source, it can always be updated. Greetings, RagingR2 (talk) 19:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- P.S. If I should find anything later on this subject, I will come back to this conversation. Greetings, RagingR2 (talk) 19:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)