User talk:TYCF
Hello.
[edit]Hello. TYCF (talk) 07:04, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]Hi TYCF. Thank you for your message. I removed the excessive and unsourced content, as well as 32 images... Please do not simply restore without references and please be more selective of any images that you decide may be useful, bearing in mind the length of the article and that Wikipedia is not a gallery of images. Thank you. Technopat (talk) 12:57, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Technopat I know there are some unsourced content, but they are there before I started editing. And I don't understand why it is excessive and also, is it too long because of the images ? TYCF (talk) 13:18, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hi again. In response to your new messages, and as Icommented above, please do not simply restore the content, especially if unsourced or badly sourced and "please be more selective of any images that you decide may be useful, bearing in mind the length of the article and that Wikipedia is not a gallery of images." --Technopat (talk) 13:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Technopat, Please, I did remove all the bad information. TYCF (talk) 15:05, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Also, I did not simply restore the content. TYCF (talk) 15:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Technopat, Please, I did remove all the bad information. TYCF (talk) 15:05, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hi again. In response to your new messages, and as Icommented above, please do not simply restore the content, especially if unsourced or badly sourced and "please be more selective of any images that you decide may be useful, bearing in mind the length of the article and that Wikipedia is not a gallery of images." --Technopat (talk) 13:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hi again. True, you did not simply restore all the content/images, but your new version is simply not acceptable, either. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a parish council newsletter or blog nor, as I've pointed out now on more than one occasion, is it a gallery of images. Moving forward, as the page stands, I reckon one image of the town is enough, although, at a stretch, you could include one of the nature reserve, even if that has its own page. The list of councillors is irrelevant and anyone who is desperately keen to know who they are, can simply visit the dedicated website. Wikipedia is not a directory. --Technopat (talk) 15:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, and thank you. TYCF (talk) 15:51, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hi again. True, you did not simply restore all the content/images, but your new version is simply not acceptable, either. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a parish council newsletter or blog nor, as I've pointed out now on more than one occasion, is it a gallery of images. Moving forward, as the page stands, I reckon one image of the town is enough, although, at a stretch, you could include one of the nature reserve, even if that has its own page. The list of councillors is irrelevant and anyone who is desperately keen to know who they are, can simply visit the dedicated website. Wikipedia is not a directory. --Technopat (talk) 15:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
draft article User:TheresNoTime/Hans-Wolfgang Romberg
[edit]The draft article User:TheresNoTime/Hans-Wolfgang Romberg might be ready to submit. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 10:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)