User talk:Vsanborn
Welcome!
Hello, Vsanborn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —Wknight94 (talk) 20:01, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Alternate account tags
[edit]Hi. Please consider using the {{User Alternate Acct}} and {{User Alt Acct Master}} tags for your User:Vsanborn and User:Vjsanborn accounts. Thanks. —Wknight94 (talk) 04:15, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- We can't get rid of either account. The best thing to do in this case is to use the tags that I mentioned above. Read WP:SOCK#Alternate accounts for more info. Let me know if you have any questions. —Wknight94 (talk) 20:01, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Account Tags
[edit]I want Vsanborn to be the main account, but frankly I have no idea where to add the tag. Thanks for your help. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vsanborn (talk • contribs) .
- You can put one on the user page for this account and one on the user page for the other account. —Wknight94 (talk) 23:52, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent edits to Jane Austen. The section in the Austen article is actually a summary of a longer article, Reception history of Jane Austen, so usually we just add details to that article and Bride and Prejudice is already covered there. Would you be interested in working on that article? It could use a lot of expansion! Awadewit (talk) 21:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Dog Park
[edit]Thanks for your kind comments about the dog park article. I think you've made some substantial improvements to the article. When I started the article I thought of it as a simple piece on a mundane topic. It appears that people are capable of developing strong opinions on almost anything. The Dogfather (talk) 13:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Pevernagie (talk) 19:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Popularity of Regency reenactment
[edit]Do you have any information regarding the popularity of Regency reenactment? Anything would be good: estimated number of reenactors doing this period, countries or regions in which is it particularly popular, etc. Thanks, cmadler (talk) 14:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)