Jump to content

Van Dusen v. Barrack

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnomieBOT (talk | contribs) at 19:08, 6 June 2016 (Substing templates: {{scite}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Van Dusen v. Barrack
Argued January 8–9, 1964
Decided March 30, 1964
Full case nameVan Dusen, U.S. District Judge, et al. v. Barrack, Administratrix, et al.
Citations376 U.S. 612 (more)
84 S. Ct. 805; 11 L. Ed. 2d 945; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1537
Court membership
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
Tom C. Clark · John M. Harlan II
William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart
Byron White · Arthur Goldberg
Case opinions
MajorityGoldberg, joined by Warren, Douglas, Clark, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White
ConcurrenceBlack

Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a case is transferred from a federal court in one state to a federal court in another, the choice of law should be that of the state in which the case was originally filed.[1]

References

  1. ^ Yeazell, S.C. Civil Procedure, Seventh Edition. Aspen Publishers, New York, NY: 2008, p. 231