Jump to content

Walt Disney World Co. v. Wood

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CitationCleanerBot (talk | contribs) at 07:11, 14 November 2016 (→‎top: clean up, url redundant with jstor, and/or remove accessdate if no url using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Walt Disney World Co. v. Wood, 489 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986) is a court decision by the Florida District Court of Appeal illustrating the principle of joint and several liability when combined with comparative negligence.

In 1971, Aloysia Wood was injured on the Grand Prix bumper-car ride at Walt Disney World when her then-fiance, Daniel Wood, rammed his car into the rear of hers. The jury assessed her damages at $75,000. The jury then returned a verdict finding Aloysia Wood 14% at fault, Daniel Wood 85% at fault, and Disney 1% at fault. [1] The court (under the doctrine of joint and several liability) then ordered Disney to pay 86% of the damages - its percentage plus the husband's percentage - because the husband was unable to pay his portion.

This case is sometimes cited in calls for tort reform.[1]

References

  1. ^ Shmit, Joan T; Oleszczuk, Timothy K; Anderson, Dan R. "An Analysis of Litigation Claiming Joint and Several Liability". The Journal of Risk and Insurance. 58 (3): 401–402. JSTOR 253399.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Walt_Disney_World_Co._v._Wood&oldid=749425044"