Wikipedia:Training/Newcomers/Training feedback

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How to give your feedback

  • Use the "edit this page" tab at the top. Scroll down in the editing window that appears.
  • There is a blank section at the bottom of this page. Copy it below itself for the next person to use.
  • Now return to the first of the two blank sections.
  • Fill in your username in the first line, your opinions on each of the five topics listed, and sign at the bottom using ~~~~ (this will insert your username and the date).

Feedback from Ubikitty[edit]

What I liked
The concept
What I didn't like
bugs
What was missing
details
What was unnecessary
repetitions
If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
wicked

--Ubikitty (talk) 02:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Psek Spec[edit]

What I liked

citation

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

how to do citation bit impossible

What was unnecessary

Nothing was unnecessary

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Marvelous to learn

--Psek Spec (talk) 18:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Wolffg[edit]

What I liked
The instructions were clear and brief and will illustrated.

...

What I didn't like
It cld have been more interactive along the way, but I will try it out now.

...

What was missing
I don't know yet.

...

What was unnecessary
I can't imagine. It seemed a good brief intro.

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I haven't tried it yet, but now I see my "what I didn't like" has been handled.

...

--Wolffg (talk) 14:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Skywalkerff[edit]

What I liked

...Introduction of editing ...How to avoid plagiarism

What I didn't like

...Nothing

What was missing

...How can editors ensure their works reliable?

What was unnecessary

...Nothing

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...Email or chat group?

--Skywalkerff (talk) 14:47, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Rj01746255101[edit]

It was an amazing experience

What I liked

...Type of content entry

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...I hope article writing will be more easy in future with predefined category wise template as an example.

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...It should be clear with example like section wise editing by including images (who?how?why?when?where?)

--Rj01746255101 (talk) 10:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)RJ01746255101[reply]


Feedback from Nizakat sindhi[edit]

What I liked

I liked it I think it is better way to teach new comers with written as well as videos also

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

Nizakat sindhi (talk) 15:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from <your username>[edit]

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

Now sign by inserting four tildes (~~~~) ...

~~Thanks[edit]

What I liked

...


What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Vijaysir (talk) 10:05, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~[edit]

What I liked

...The way details described

What I didn't like

...none

What was missing

...can't tell

What was unnecessary

...none

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

...

--Toast Marotho (talk) 21:48, 26 December 2022 (UTC)reference link[reply]

~~[edit]

What I liked
That you have a thorough breakdown on how to edit wikipedia articles, but also a clear accompanied video.

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was easy to do. I learned how to save changes, do revisions and publish it as well.

...

--Annilla (talk) 17:45, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]