Wikipedia:Categorization/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Soeangel1982 (talk | contribs) ←Blanked the page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Wikipedia:Categorization/Noticeboard/Header}} |
|||
== Category tree == |
|||
The <nowiki><categorytree></categorytree></nowiki> markup has been redundant for a while (ever since all the subcats were included on every page when there are more than 200 pages listed). It cause a very ugly and annoying clutter that is now completely unnecessary. I want to have all these tags rooted out and removed. It tried to get it sorted over at [[WP:BOTS]] but they want some sort of discussion on it before doing it. -- [[User:Alan Liefting|Alan Liefting]] ([[User_talk:Alan_Liefting|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Alan_Liefting|contribs]]) 03:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:I think that's a good idea, though I wonder if you could point to an example. I never liked the <nowiki><categorytree></nowiki> markup and always considered it to be a sub-optimal implementation. The ideal solution, in my opinion, would be for all category pages – or, at least, those with subcategories – to have a small, floating link in the top left corner with the following code: <code><nowiki>[[Special:CategoryTree/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|Category tree]]</nowiki></code>. I don't know, however, whether this type of change can be implemented locally on en-wiki or requires a [[:mw:Developers|dev update]] to the MediaWiki software. -- '''[[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Black Falcon|talk]])</sup> 06:45, 28 May 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::'''''Are''''' ''"the subcats ... included on every page when there are more than 200 pages listed"''? - I am not seeing that. - <b>[[User:Jc37|jc37]]</b> 07:55, 28 May 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== American people by occupation by state == |
|||
I am requesting comment on '''[[Category talk:American people by occupation by state#Scope and the significance of the occupation–state association|a proposal]]''' to clarify the scope of the [[Special:CategoryTree/American people by occupation by state|''American people by occupation by state'' category tree]]. I would highly appreciate comments or suggestions about how we could attempt to address the issues that exist. Thank you, -- '''[[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Black Falcon|talk]])</sup> 22:08, 25 July 2012 (UTC) |
|||
==User talk:Kwork2/Archive 3== |
|||
Can an admin remove [[:Category:Temporary Wikipedian userpages]] from [[User talk:Kwork2/Archive 3]]?—[[User:Yutsi|<b>Yutsi</b>]] [[User_Talk:Yutsi|<sup><small>'''Talk'''</small></sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Yutsi| <small>'''Contributions'''</small>]] ( 偉特 ) 01:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:{{done}} <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 21:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Apparent unnecessary sub-categories == |
|||
I've noticed that [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:RafikiSykes User:RafikiSykes] has unilaterally created numerous subcategories, for example, for [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Julie_Andrews Julie Andrews], [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Elizabeth_Taylor_in_the_1960s Elizabeth Taylor] and [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Andy_Murray Andy Marray]. However, this seems counterproductive for many, if not all cases, in merely adding complexity and more steps for users. It's hard to imagine most people wanting to look at images preferring to filter only images for a particular decade, film or location. In all the cases of such new categories I've viewed, they all strike me as pointless since most of the images fit on a single page already. I think they should be reverted and the subcategories removed. --[[User:Wikiwatcher1|Wikiwatcher1]] ([[User talk:Wikiwatcher1|talk]]) 02:03, 6 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:The method of sorting Andy murray by year had already been done with the 2009 category etc before I even joined wiki. I simply added some more in line with that as it seemed strange to have some years split and not others.[[Special:Contributions/87.114.21.104|87.114.21.104]] ([[User talk:87.114.21.104|talk]]) 23:21, 8 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Deletion review for [[:Category:Actresses]] == |
|||
I have asked for a '''[[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 September 11#Category:Actresses|deletion review]]''' of [[:Category:Actresses]]. (the category link is currently a redirect). |
|||
It may be seen as an unusual DRV, because the relevant CFD took place 6 years. So I thought it fair to list it here. --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#996600; cursor: not-allowed;">Brown</span>HairedGirl]] <small>[[User talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</small> 10:41, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Welsh Championship == |
|||
Hello. I created this page, but have probably gone to the limit of my Wikipedia knowledge. Someone has been onto it asking for it to be categorised. Can anyone help?? Thanks [[User:Shenko316|Shenko316]] ([[User talk:Shenko316|talk]]) 16:39, 3 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Adding a category as a subcategory == |
|||
It seems that [[:Category:Chinese multilingual support templates]] should be a subcategory of [[:Category:Multilingual support templates]], but I can't find instructions on how to add a category as a subcategory of a category. Likewise [[:Category:Japonic multilingual support templates]] and [[:Category:Korean name templates]]. [[User:LittleBenW|LittleBen]] ([[User talk:LittleBenW|talk]]) 00:00, 24 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:They are fine as they are. [[:Category:Chinese multilingual support templates]] is categorised in [[:Category:Sino-Tibetan multilingual support templates]] which {{em|is}} part of [[:Category:Multilingual support templates]], so there is no need for the former to be categorised that way. |
|||
:*There does not seem to be any similarity whatsoever between the different Chinese-related languages or Chinese-related character sets and [[Standard Tibetan]]. [[User:LittleBenW|LittleBen]] ([[User talk:LittleBenW|talk]]) 11:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:*I agree that it should also be directly a subcategory of "Multilingual support templates", since several of the Chinese templates are also used for non-Sino-Tibetan language articles that directly use Chinese character derivatives, or because the complex templates are adaptable enough to be used for their particular languages. -- [[Special:Contributions/65.92.181.190|65.92.181.190]] ([[User talk:65.92.181.190|talk]]) 06:05, 28 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:Similarly with [[:Category:Japonic multilingual support templates]] which is in [[:Category:Altaic multilingual support templates]] which is in [[:Category:Multilingual support templates]]. -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 04:17, 24 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:*The [[Altaic languages]] article says that it's debatable (questionable) whether Japanese and Korean can be classified as Altaic languages, so surely that classification would neither be understood by, nor acceptable to, the majority. (I can't imagine anyone thinking of searching for Japanese templates under "Altaic language templates"). [[User:LittleBenW|LittleBen]] ([[User talk:LittleBenW|talk]]) 11:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::These languages and categorisation schemes are completely out of my field of interest; I only outlined how those two template categories are already part of the parent category. Whether it is appropriate to have them categorised that way or whether the categories are appropriately named should probably involve editors from relevant projects, e.g. [[WP:WikiProject Japan]], [[WP:WikiProject Korea]], [[WP:WikiProject China]]. -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 13:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::*Cross-posted [[Wikipedia_talk:Categories_for_discussion#Categorization_of_multilingual_support_templates|here]], [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Japan#Classify_Japanese_as_an_Altaic_language.3F|here]], and [[Wikipedia:Help_desk#Category:Altaic_multilingual_support_templates_seems_inappropriate|here]]. [[User:LittleBenW|LittleBen]] ([[User talk:LittleBenW|talk]]) 16:31, 27 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Treatment of Town Water Supply == |
|||
I want you to create a page on 'Treatment of Town Water Supply <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/117.199.26.220|117.199.26.220]] ([[User talk:117.199.26.220|talk]]) 19:22, 22 November 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
==Location categories== |
|||
I think we should have categories for events, objects, etc. located off planet. categories for near earth orbit, or geostationary orbit, for objects on the moon, on mars. not a lot yet, but since we can categorize earth bound events and objects by their location, why not such off planet? I would start with [[:Category:Events in near-Earth orbit]], [[:Category:Events on the Moon]], [[:Category:Events on Mars]], [[:Category:Objects in near-Earth orbit]]. [[User:Mercurywoodrose|Mercurywoodrose]] ([[User talk:Mercurywoodrose|talk]]) 05:01, 26 November 2012 (UTC) |
|||
==Israeli martial arts== |
|||
I was just looking at the World Muaythai Council article and noticed it was in Category:Israeli martial arts. I went to that page and found virtually every martial art is listed there. Is there an easy way to correct that? [[User:Papaursa|Papaursa]] ([[User talk:Papaursa|talk]]) 04:20, 10 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Interestingly the Category is not listed in those articles. It seems to be some sort of global command or perhaps a template. No idea how to fix.[[User:PRehse|Peter Rehse]] ([[User talk:PRehse|talk]]) 11:56, 10 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Fixed. The problem was with a link added to {{tl|Martial arts}} the other day. It may take a little while for the change to be reflected on the category page. - [[User:EurekaLott|Eureka Lott]] 13:50, 10 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::Thanks[[User:PRehse|Peter Rehse]] ([[User talk:PRehse|talk]]) 13:51, 10 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== American novelists vs. American women novelists == |
|||
{{archive top|result=This has been discussed, and resolved, through [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_April_24#Category:American_women_novelists]]. The result was, keep and merge the women novelists to the parent, which is in line with current guidance at [[WP:EGRS]]. --[[User:Obiwankenobi|Obi-Wan Kenobi]] ([[User talk:Obiwankenobi|talk]]) 18:43, 10 May 2013 (UTC)}} |
|||
This has come up on Twitter, so there will probably be incoming. |
|||
At some point the women writers in Category:American Novelists were moved to Category: American Women Novelists. I doubt that it was the intention that "American Novelists" mean exclusively "American Male Novelists" (a presently nonexistent category). |
|||
* The obvious change is to make all members of American Women Novelists also members of American Novelists. |
|||
* The pedantic change is to create a subcategory "American Male Novelists"; however, this would at least require the addition of "American Gender-Unspecified Novelists" (I can think of at least one who writes SF), and would more likely require a large number of further variants that Wiki would war over forever. |
|||
The intent was probably to reduce the number of novelists in the "American Novelists" category; the unfortunate effect is to exclude women novelists from a category to which they belong. |
|||
[[User:Serpyllum|Serpyllum]] ([[User talk:Serpyllum|talk]]) 19:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Amy Tan posted about this on her Twitter account, and I understand other authors have weighed in off-Wiki as well. I think she does have a point. Why *does* WP have a Cat:American novelists and a Cat:American women novelists? What's the point and, also, what message does it send? IMO, I think that the 'Cat:American women novelists' should be considered for deletion...does it *matter* what gender a novelist is? And, frankly, if the subjects themselves (Are there any [[WP:BLP]] concerns as well?) object to their being put into a WP Category I think that should probably also be taken into account. [[User:Shearonink|Shearonink]] ([[User talk:Shearonink|talk]]) 14:22, 26 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::its been done before [[:Category:American male actors]] with wonderful counterparts like [[:Category:Indian actresses]] -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 17:53, 26 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::The subjects themselves object to this categorization... seems like that ought to have some bearing on the issue. Also see [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/wikipedia-in-sexism-row-after-labelling-harper-lee-and-others-women-novelists-while-men-are-american-novelists-8590632.html this story from The Independent], [http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/opinion/sunday/wikipedias-sexism-toward-female-novelists.html?_r=0 this New York Times piece], [http://www.newstatesman.com/sci-tech/2013/04/wikipedia-wars-are-there-really-novelists-and-women-novelists this New Statesman story], [http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/04/25/178943598/book-news-maya-angelou-out-of-hospital-recovering-at-home this NPR blog], [http://jezebel.com/wikipedia-is-quietly-moving-women-off-their-american-no-481069352 this story from Jezebel.Com] and so on. Identifying an author as male or female has little to no bearing on how they do their job... with the Categories you mentioned above, a male actor and a female actor would usually be hired on the basis of their acting ability *and* appearance - TV/film/theatre are visual mediums. One wouldn't hire Rupert Grint or Conan O'Brian to be Othello or Liam Neeson to be Batgirl. The written page is a written medium...none of us can tell, from the black & white marks on this page what sex Wikipedia editors are. Designating an author into a Category solely on the basis of their sex would seem to be an artificial distinction having little to do with their actual job. [[User:Shearonink|Shearonink]] ([[User talk:Shearonink|talk]]) 19:38, 26 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::This category (and several related categories) are being discussed at [[Category talk:American women novelists]] and [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion]]. It probably would be best to continue this conversation there instead of fragmenting it further. - [[User:EurekaLott|Eureka Lott]] 20:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Thank you for the link. I did do a search and couldn't find any links to ongoing discussions elsewhere on-Wiki, so my intent was not to fragment but to centralize and gather a consensus. Will continue there. Cheers, [[User:Shearonink|Shearonink]] ([[User talk:Shearonink|talk]]) 22:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::The issue's main discussion forum on-Wiki seems to be at [[WP:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 April 24]] in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_April_24#Category:American_women_novelists Category:American women novelists] section. Cheers, [[User:Shearonink|Shearonink]] ([[User talk:Shearonink|talk]]) 04:15, 27 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Wikipedia has those categories for the same reason it has every other category. That is, to simplify navigation. There are no messages or implications. It is not a relegation. - [[User:Shiftchange|Shiftchange]] ([[User talk:Shiftchange|talk]]) 11:35, 29 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::Of course it is demeaning, and separative. [[User:GeorgeLouis|GeorgeLouis]] ([[User talk:GeorgeLouis|talk]]) 15:44, 10 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
{{archive bottom}} |
|||
== Nonexistent category with redlinks to it: create the category of delete the links? == |
|||
I was looking at our [[Gideon Macon]] page (potential COI Notice: I am a direct descendant) and noticed a redlinked category; [[Macon family]], with [[Frances Jones (colonist)]], [[Gideon Macon]] and [[Nathaniel Macon]] in the category. |
|||
I would like to fix the redlinks. The question is whether to delete the category on those three pages or to create the category page. I am leaning towards deleting the links because this does not seem like a particularly useful category, but I would like a second opinion. |
|||
If the category is created, the following pages also belong in the category:<br /> |
|||
[[Uncle Dave Macon]] --Nathaniel Macon was his great-great-uncle.<br /> |
|||
[[Robert B. Macon]] -- Gideon Macon was his great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather.<br /> |
|||
The following pages do not:<br /> |
|||
[[Robert C. Macon]] -- his Father was born Edward Newton Meekins, changed it to Macon.<br /> |
|||
[[Mark Macon]] -- I cannot find any ancestry info on him. Possible descendant of a slave owned by a Macon, many of whom took the Macon name.<br /> |
|||
[[Max Macon]] -- he bears a family resemblance, but I cannot find any ancestry info.<br /> |
|||
[[Robert le Maçon]] -- athough there has been speculation, nobody has traced Gideon Macon's ancestry.<br /> |
|||
--[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 02:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Unless there is an article indicating that a particular family group are notable, please delete the category links. I have created [[Macon (surname)]] as a split from the disambiguation page, so please expand the list there instead, adding info & sources about the history of the name. – [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] '''<font color="#FF0000">[[Special:Contributions/Fayenatic london|L]]</font>'''[[User talk:Fayenatic london|ondon]] 21:26, 2 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Done. Thanks! --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 05:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Proposal for Category: American novelists == |
|||
In the category page for American novelists, the list of individual author articles is so long that a casual reader may think it is intended to be approximately complete. Therefore I have proposed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:American_novelists#Proposal_to_remove_list_of_novelists_from_the_article] to change the description of the list of individual articles to "This list of individual authors is intended to assist the categorization process; it is not intended to be complete. For a list intended for use by the general public, see List_of_American_novelists [9]." I would appreciate comments on this proposal. [[User:Olorinish|Olorinish]] ([[User talk:Olorinish|talk]]) 12:18, 2 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Edits to category guidance == |
|||
I've made some edits/clarifications to the category guidance - the diffs can be seen [[User:Obiwankenobi/sandbox/categorization|here]]. Please take a look and send any comments to [[Wikipedia_talk:Categorization#May 2013 changes to guidance]]. --[[User:Obiwankenobi|Obi-Wan Kenobi]] ([[User talk:Obiwankenobi|talk]]) 16:13, 10 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Confusing LGBT with sexual assault of children == |
|||
The category "Childhood-related LGBT films" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Childhood_LGBT-related_films ) is dominated by films that are actually about pedophiles seducing children. IMHO, films that are primarily about that type of relationship are not correctly identified as being LGBT. Either way, rather than having an argument on the page where two people who have different ideas simply spout their viewpoint, I thought it worthwhile to bring this up as a categorization issue. In a controversial proposal such as this category is implicitly making, I would think it would be crucial that the categorization is based on something other than OR or personal convictions one way or the other. Therefore, I would think that such a category should be refrained from unless reliable, objective sources can be found to give us a guideline other than disparate people's own subjective conclusions regarding the issue. The issue is emotionally close to me and so for the sake of objectivity I usually avoid editing such topics myself. I am bringing this to your attention because I do believe that this categorization cannot exist without making certain non-neutral claims about adult-child sexual relationships. Categories regarding juvenile sexuality in film and pedophilia already exist and allow for a listing of these films without making claims as to whether child abuse is correctly considered an LGBT relationship. Thank you for considering this and please accept my apologies if I have come across as less than dispassionate. No matter what the conclusion, please know that as I have made the issue known to the broader community I will not myself be involved in the issue any longer. [[User:Wickedjacob|Wickedjacob]] ([[User talk:Wickedjacob|talk]]) 20:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I'd suggest nominating it for discussion at CFD. If you have twinkle it can do this quite easily and automatically. It seems the issue is the scope of the category, which is fair to bring to CFD to discuss. --[[User:Obiwankenobi|Obi-Wan Kenobi]] ([[User talk:Obiwankenobi|talk]]) 22:21, 23 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Missing template categories due to missing template documentation - == |
|||
Some templates, e.g., {{tl|BLP self-published}}, are missing documentation and hence categorization. |
|||
I wanted to add the missing category, but would not be comfortable filling in the rest of the documentation. |
|||
I would like to indicate that the documentation is a stub, but could not find such a 'doc-stub'. |
|||
Perhaps I should make an admin request? |
|||
I found that I could use {{tl|no documentation}} |
|||
[[User:Dpleibovitz|Dpleibovitz]] ([[User talk:Dpleibovitz|talk]]) 16:32, 13 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
PS. Why are templates categorized in their documentation? |
|||
[[User:Dpleibovitz|Dpleibovitz]] ([[User talk:Dpleibovitz|talk]]) 15:29, 13 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
SAHARA INDIA |
|||